mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring Format Consistency for Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2307.15504 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning has emerged as a promising approach to enhancing large language models in following human instructions. It is shown that increasing the diversity and number of instructions in the training data can consistently enhance generalization performance, which facilitates a recent endeavor to collect various instructions and integrate existing instruction tuning datasets into larger collections. However, different users have their unique ways of expressing instructions, and there often exist variations across different datasets in the instruction styles and formats, i.e., format inconsistency. In this work, we propose a framework named Unified Instruction Tuning (UIT), which calls OpenAI APIs for automatic format transfer among different instruction tuning datasets such as PromptSource, FLAN and CrossFit. With the framework, we (1) demonstrate the necessity of maintaining format consistency in instruction tuning; (2) improve the generalization performance on unseen instructions on T5-LM-xl; (3) provide a novel perplexity-based denoising method to reduce the noise of automatic format transfer to make the UIT framework more practical and a smaller offline model based on GPT-J that achieves comparable format transfer capability to OpenAI APIs to reduce costs in practice. Further analysis regarding variations of targeted formats and other effects is intended.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2023.

Builds on

22 of 27 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  5. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  6. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  7. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  8. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
  9. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  10. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  11. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
  12. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
10 more
  1. 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
  2. 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 289
  3. 2022OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalizationcited by 236
  4. 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 175
  5. 2021ExT5: Towards Extreme Multi-Task Scaling for Transfer Learningcited by 161
  6. 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 160
  7. 2022Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptionscited by 152
  8. 2021CrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLPcited by 142
  9. 2022PromDA: Prompt-based Data Augmentation for Low-Resource NLU Taskscited by 51
  10. 2022PseudoReasoner: Leveraging Pseudo Labels for Commonsense Knowledge Base Populationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: