Self-Contrastive Graph Diffusion Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Augmentation techniques and sampling strategies are crucial in contrastive learning, but in most existing works, augmentation techniques require careful design, and their sampling strategies can only capture a small amount of intrinsic supervision information. Additionally, the existing methods require complex designs to obtain two different representations of the data. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel framework called the Self-Contrastive Graph Diffusion Network (SCGDN). Our framework consists of two main components: the Attentional Module (AttM) and the Diffusion Module (DiFM). AttM aggregates higher-order structure and feature information to get an excellent embedding, while DiFM balances the state of each node in the graph through Laplacian diffusion learning and allows the cooperative evolution of adjacency and feature information in the graph. Unlike existing methodologies, SCGDN is an augmentation-free approach that avoids "sampling bias" and semantic drift, without the need for pre-training. We conduct a high-quality sampling of samples based on structure and feature information. If two nodes are neighbors, they are considered positive samples of each other. If two disconnected nodes are also unrelated on kNN graph, they are considered negative samples for each other. The contrastive objective reasonably uses our proposed sampling strategies, and the redundancy reduction term minimizes redundant information in the embedding and can well retain more discriminative information. In this novel framework, the graph self-contrastive learning paradigm gives expression to a powerful force. SCGDN effectively balances between preserving high-order structure information and avoiding overfitting. The results manifest that SCGDN can consistently generate outperformance over both the contrastive methods and the classical methods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2023.
Builds on
33 of 42 references.
References · 33
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
- 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 651
- 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 535
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
21 more
- 2020GCC: Graph Contrastive Coding for Graph Neural Network Pre-Trainingcited by 461
- 2021GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusioncited by 258
- 2019Attributed Graph Clustering: A Deep Attentional Embedding Approachcited by 149
- 2020Structural Deep Clustering Networkcited by 145
- 2020A unifying mutual information view of metric learning: cross-entropy vs. pairwise lossescited by 100
- 2021Deep Graph Clustering via Dual Correlation Reductioncited by 97
- 2019Attributed Graph Clustering via Adaptive Graph Convolutioncited by 96
- 2021Augmentation-Free Self-Supervised Learning on Graphscited by 94
- 2020Adaptive Graph Encoder for Attributed Graph Embeddingcited by 88
- 2019Learning Graph Embedding with Adversarial Training Methodscited by 84
- 2021Beltrami Flow and Neural Diffusion on Graphscited by 84
- 2021Multi-view Contrastive Graph Clusteringcited by 76
- 2021ProGCL: Rethinking Hard Negative Mining in Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 72
- 2020Deep Fusion Clustering Networkcited by 71
- 2021Multi-Scale Contrastive Siamese Networks for Self-Supervised Graph Representation Learningcited by 70
- 2023Cluster-guided Contrastive Graph Clustering Networkcited by 60
- 2021Automated Self-Supervised Learning for Graphscited by 50
- 2021Rethinking Graph Auto-Encoder Models for Attributed Graph Clusteringcited by 37
- 2022Optimization-Induced Graph Implicit Nonlinear Diffusioncited by 28
- 2022Contrastive Laplacian Eigenmapscited by 24
- 2021Stationary Diffusion State Neural Estimation for Multiview Clusteringcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025HyperGCL: Multi-Modal Graph Contrastive Learning via Learnable Hypergraph Viewscited by 4
- 2025A Graph Laplacian Eigenvector-based Pre-training Method for Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Robust Contrastive Graph Clustering with Adaptive Local-Global Integrationcited by 0
- 2026Bridge the Gaps: Heterogeneous Attributed Graph Clustering via Quaternion Representation Learningcited by 0
- 2026Bridge the Gaps: Heterogeneous Attributed Graph Clustering via Quaternion Representation Learning22 Jun 2026
- 2026Robust Contrastive Graph Clustering with Adaptive Local-Global Integration27 May 2026
- 2025A Graph Laplacian Eigenvector-based Pre-training Method for Graph Neural Networks2 Sep 2025
- 2025HyperGCL: Multi-Modal Graph Contrastive Learning via Learnable Hypergraph Views18 Feb 2025