Towards Bridging the FL Performance-Explainability Trade-Off: A Trustworthy 6G RAN Slicing Use-Case
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the context of sixth-generation (6G) networks, where diverse network slices coexist, the adoption of AI-driven zero-touch management and orchestration (MANO) becomes crucial. However, ensuring the trustworthiness of AI black-boxes in real deployments is challenging. Explainable AI (XAI) tools can play a vital role in establishing transparency among the stakeholders in the slicing ecosystem. But there is a trade-off between AI performance and explainability, posing a dilemma for trustworthy 6G network slicing because the stakeholders require both highly performing AI models for efficient resource allocation and explainable decision-making to ensure fairness, accountability, and compliance. To balance this trade off and inspired by the closed loop automation and XAI methodologies, this paper presents a novel explanation-guided in-hoc federated learning (FL) approach where a constrained resource allocation model and an explainer exchange -- in a closed loop (CL) fashion -- soft attributions of the features as well as inference predictions to achieve a transparent 6G network slicing resource management in a RAN-Edge setup under non-independent identically distributed (non-IID) datasets. In particular, we quantitatively validate the faithfulness of the explanations via the so-called attribution-based confidence metric that is included as a constraint to guide the overall training process in the run-time FL optimization task. In this respect, Integrated-Gradient (IG) as well as Input × Gradient and SHAP are used to generate the attributions for our proposed in-hoc scheme, wherefore simulation results under different methods confirm its success in tackling the performance-explainability trade-off and its superiority over the unconstrained Integrated-Gradient post-hoc FL baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2023.
Builds on
13 of 35 references.
References · 13
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
- 2018Two-Player Games for Efficient Non-Convex Constrained Optimizationcited by 55
- 2018Training Well-Generalizing Classifiers for Fairness Metrics and Other Data-Dependent Constraintscited by 53
- 2022Going Beyond XAI: A Systematic Survey for Explanation-Guided Learningcited by 36
- 2019Interpret Federated Learning with Shapley Valuescited by 33
- 2021Evaluating explainable artificial intelligence methods for multi-label deep learning classification tasks in remote sensingcited by 26
- 2022Neuro-symbolic Explainable Artificial Intelligence Twin for Zero-touch IoE in Wireless Networkcited by 8
- 2020Towards Ubiquitous AI in 6G with Federated Learningcited by 5
- 2021Applications of Explainable AI for 6G: Technical Aspects, Use Cases, and Research Challengescited by 5
- 2020Federated Orchestration for Network Slicing of Bandwidth and Computational Resourcecited by 4
- 2022Knowledge-powered Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Network Automation Towards 6Gcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2026A Survey on AI for 6G: Challenges and Opportunities30 Mar 2026
- 2024AI-Native Multi-Access Future Networks -- The REASON Architecture11 Nov 2024