Federated Orchestration for Network Slicing of Bandwidth and Computational Resource
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Network slicing has been considered as one of the key enablers for 5G to support diversified IoT services and application scenarios. This paper studies the distributed network slicing for a massive scale IoT network supported by 5G with fog computing. Multiple services with various requirements need to be supported by both spectrum resource offered by 5G network and computational resourc of the fog computing network. We propose a novel distributed framework based on a new control plane entity, federated-orchestrator , which can coordinate the spectrum and computational resources without requiring any exchange of the local data and resource information from BSs. We propose a distributed resource allocation algorithm based on Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers with Partial Variable Splitting . We prove DistADMM-PVS minimizes the average service response time of the entire network with guaranteed worst-case performance for all supported types of services when the coordination between the F-orchestrator and BSs is perfectly synchronized. Motivated by the observation that coordination synchronization may result in high coordination delay that can be intolerable when the network is large in scale, we propose a novel asynchronized ADMM algorithm. We prove that AsynADMM can converge to the global optimal solution with improved scalability and negligible coordination delay. We evaluate the performance of our proposed framework using two-month of traffic data collected in a in-campus smart transportation system supported by a 5G network. Extensive simulation has been conducted for both pedestrian and vehicular-related services during peak and non-peak hours. Our results show that the proposed framework offers significant reduction on service response time for both supported services, especially compared to network slicing with only a single resource.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Federated Learning for 6G: Paradigms, Taxonomy, Recent Advances and Insightscited by 4
- 2022Decentralized Federated Reinforcement Learning for User-Centric Dynamic TFDD Controlcited by 3
- 2023Towards Bridging the FL Performance-Explainability Trade-Off: A Trustworthy 6G RAN Slicing Use-Casecited by 2
- 2022TEFL: Turbo Explainable Federated Learning for 6G Trustworthy Zero-Touch Network Slicingcited by 1
- 2023Federated Learning for 6G: Paradigms, Taxonomy, Recent Advances and Insights7 Dec 2023
- 2023Towards Bridging the FL Performance-Explainability Trade-Off: A Trustworthy 6G RAN Slicing Use-Case24 Jul 2023
- 2022Decentralized Federated Reinforcement Learning for User-Centric Dynamic TFDD Control4 Nov 2022
- 2022TEFL: Turbo Explainable Federated Learning for 6G Trustworthy Zero-Touch Network Slicing18 Oct 2022