Adaptive debiased machine learning using data-driven model selection techniques
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Debiased machine learning estimators for smooth functionals in nonparametric models can exhibit substantial variability and instability, often leading practitioners to instead rely on parametric or semiparametric working models. Such models, however, may be misspecified and can therefore introduce bias. We study how data-driven model selection can be combined with debiased machine learning to construct estimators that adapt to structure in the data-generating distribution. To this end, we propose Adaptive Debiased Machine Learning (ADML), a nonparametric framework for constructing superefficient estimators of pathwise differentiable parameters. The framework unifies a broad class of previously proposed adaptive estimators, including methods based on variable selection, learned feature representations, and collaborative targeted learning. It requires only high-level conditions and approximate validity of the selection procedure, which are implied by lower-level conditions already assumed in important settings, including sieve-based selection, sparsity-based methods such as the Lasso, and data-adaptive feature representations. We show that ADML estimators yield regular and efficient root-(n) inference for an oracle projection parameter induced by a data-adaptive oracle submodel. This oracle parameter coincides with the target parameter at the true distribution but typically has a smaller efficiency bound, thereby yielding superefficiency for the target parameter. As a practical illustration, we introduce a broad class of automatic ADML estimators for continuous linear functionals of the outcome regression, in which model selection is performed directly on the regression itself. Motivated by overlap challenges in causal inference, we develop new superefficient plug-in estimators for the average treatment effect based on calibration in semiparametric regression models.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2023.
Builds on
26 of 118 references.
References · 26
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 328
- 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 171
- 2014Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffscited by 97
- 2013Exact post-selection inference, with application to the lassocited by 90
- 2013Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Regressioncited by 78
- 2018De-Biased Machine Learning of Global and Local Parameters Using Regularized Riesz Representerscited by 34
- 2015Selective Sequential Model Selectioncited by 16
- 2017Selective inference for effect modification via the lassocited by 12
- 2019Multivariate extensions of isotonic regression and total variation denoising via entire monotonicity and Hardy-Krause variationcited by 12
- 2019Efficient Estimation of Pathwise Differentiable Target Parameters with the Undersmoothed Highly Adaptive Lassocited by 12
- 2019Selective machine learning of doubly robust functionalscited by 9
- 2017In Defense of the Indefensible: A Very Naive Approach to High-Dimensional Inferencecited by 8
14 more
- 2018False Discovery Rate Control via Debiased Lassocited by 8
- 2023On Weighted Orthogonal Learners for Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 8
- 2017On Adaptive Propensity Score Truncation in Causal Inferencecited by 6
- 2019Minimax Semiparametric Learning With Approximate Sparsitycited by 6
- 2021MARS via LASSOcited by 5
- 2023Rank-transformed subsampling: inference for multiple data splitting and exchangeable p-valuescited by 5
- 2020Universal sieve-based strategies for efficient estimation using machine learning toolscited by 4
- 2019A nonparametric super-efficient estimator of the average treatment effectcited by 3
- 2021The costs and benefits of uniformly valid causal inference with high-dimensional nuisance parameterscited by 3
- 2021Why Machine Learning Cannot Ignore Maximum Likelihood Estimationcited by 3
- 2017Collaborative-controlled LASSO for Constructing Propensity Score-based Estimators in High-Dimensional Datacited by 2
- 2019Nonparametric Bootstrap Inference for the Targeted Highly Adaptive LASSO Estimatorcited by 2
- 2014Faithful Variable Screening for High-Dimensional Convex Regressioncited by 1
- 2022On Selecting and Conditioning in Multiple Testing and Selective Inferencecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2024Quantifying Aleatoric Uncertainty of the Treatment Effect: A Novel Orthogonal Learnercited by 10
- 2024Adaptive-TMLE for the Average Treatment Effect based on Randomized Controlled Trial Augmented with Real-World Datacited by 7
- 2025Automatic Debiased Machine Learning for Smooth Functionals of Nonparametric M-Estimandscited by 5
- 2026Efficient Inference after Directionally Stable Adaptive Experimentscited by 1
- 2025Targeted Deep Architectures: A TMLE-Based Framework for Robust Causal Inference in Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Efficient Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Two-Phase Design Problemscited by 0
- 2026Improving the Efficiency of Subgroup Analysis in Randomized Controlled Trials with TMLEcited by 0
- 2026Improving the Efficiency of Subgroup Analysis in Randomized Controlled Trials with TMLE14 May 2026
- 2026Efficient Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Two-Phase Design Problems27 Feb 2026
- 2026Efficient Inference after Directionally Stable Adaptive Experiments25 Feb 2026
- 2025Targeted Deep Architectures: A TMLE-Based Framework for Robust Causal Inference in Neural Networks16 Jul 2025
- 2025Automatic Debiased Machine Learning for Smooth Functionals of Nonparametric M-Estimands21 Jan 2025
- 2024Quantifying Aleatoric Uncertainty of the Treatment Effect: A Novel Orthogonal Learner5 Nov 2024
- 2024Adaptive-TMLE for the Average Treatment Effect based on Randomized Controlled Trial Augmented with Real-World Data12 May 2024