Automatic Data Augmentation Learning using Bilevel Optimization for Histopathological Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training a deep learning model to classify histopathological images is challenging, because of the color and shape variability of the cells and tissues, and the reduced amount of available data, which does not allow proper learning of those variations. Variations can come from the image acquisition process, for example, due to different cell staining protocols or tissue deformation. To tackle this challenge, Data Augmentation (DA) can be used during training to generate additional samples by applying transformations to existing ones, to help the model become invariant to those color and shape transformations. The problem with DA is that it is not only dataset-specific but it also requires domain knowledge, which is not always available. Without this knowledge, selecting the right transformations can only be done using heuristics or through a computationally demanding search. To address this, we propose an automatic DA learning method. In this method, the DA parameters, i.e. the transformation parameters needed to improve the model training, are considered learnable and are learned automatically using a bilevel optimization approach in a quick and efficient way using truncated backpropagation. We validated the method on six different datasets. Experimental results show that our model can learn color and affine transformations that are more helpful to train an image classifier than predefined DA transformations, which are also more expensive as they need to be selected before the training by grid search on a validation set. We also show that similarly to a model trained with RandAugment, our model has also only a few method-specific hyperparameters to tune but is performing better. This makes our model a good solution for learning the best DA parameters, especially in the context of histopathological images, where defining potentially useful transformation heuristically is not trivial.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2023.
Builds on
38 of 60 references.
References · 38
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,162
- 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,798
- 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2016Conditional Image Synthesis With Auxiliary Classifier GANscited by 565
- 2018Bilevel Programming for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta-Learningcited by 405
- 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 401
- 2015Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization through Reversible Learningcited by 360
26 more
- 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
- 2017Forward and Reverse Gradient-Based Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 234
- 2016Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradientcited by 233
- 2019Kornia: an Open Source Differentiable Computer Vision Library for PyTorchcited by 232
- 2016Gland Segmentation in Colon Histology Images: The GlaS Challenge Contestcited by 203
- 2019Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathologycited by 173
- 2019Population Based Augmentation: Efficient Learning of Augmentation Policy Schedulescited by 154
- 2018Synthetic Data Augmentation using GAN for Improved Liver Lesion Classificationcited by 136
- 2018BACH: Grand Challenge on Breast Cancer Histology Imagescited by 131
- 2019Self-Tuning Networks: Bilevel Optimization of Hyperparameters using Structured Best-Response Functionscited by 105
- 2015Constrained Convolutional Neural Networks for Weakly Supervised Segmentationcited by 100
- 2019Faster AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies using Backpropagationcited by 96
- 2017Learning to Compose Domain-Specific Transformations for Data Augmentationcited by 91
- 2015Scalable Gradient-Based Tuning of Continuous Regularization Hyperparameterscited by 71
- 2017Triple Generative Adversarial Netscited by 60
- 2019Time Matters in Regularizing Deep Networks: Weight Decay and Data Augmentation Affect Early Learning Dynamics, Matter Little Near Convergencecited by 54
- 2017A Bayesian Data Augmentation Approach for Learning Deep Modelscited by 50
- 2019Online Hyper-parameter Learning for Auto-Augmentation Strategycited by 38
- 2020Implicit differentiation of Lasso-type models for hyperparameter optimizationcited by 34
- 2021Structure-Preserving Multi-Domain Stain Color Augmentation using Style-Transfer with Disentangled Representationscited by 31
- 2020Meta Approach to Data Augmentation Optimizationcited by 22
- 2022A Theory of PAC Learnability under Transformation Invariancescited by 21
- 2017The importance of stain normalization in colorectal tissue classification with convolutional networkscited by 20
- 2020Learning Data Augmentation with Online Bilevel Optimization for Image Classificationcited by 20
- 2021Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis: A Reviewcited by 10
- 2020Data Augmentation for Histopathological Images Based on Gaussian-Laplacian Pyramid Blendingcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.