mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Analysis of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Decentralized Inventory Control Systems

arXiv 2307.11432 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.MA cs.SYcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most solutions to the inventory management problem assume a centralization of information that is incompatible with organisational constraints in real supply chain networks. The inventory management problem is a well-known planning problem in operations research, concerned with finding the optimal re-order policy for nodes in a supply chain. While many centralized solutions to the problem exist, they are not applicable to real-world supply chains made up of independent entities. The problem can however be naturally decomposed into sub-problems, each associated with an independent entity, turning it into a multi-agent system. Therefore, a decentralized data-driven solution to inventory management problems using multi-agent reinforcement learning is proposed where each entity is controlled by an agent. Three multi-agent variations of the proximal policy optimization algorithm are investigated through simulations of different supply chain networks and levels of uncertainty. The centralized training decentralized execution framework is deployed, which relies on offline centralization during simulation-based policy identification, but enables decentralization when the policies are deployed online to the real system. Results show that using multi-agent proximal policy optimization with a centralized critic leads to performance very close to that of a centralized data-driven solution and outperforms a distributed model-based solution in most cases while respecting the information constraints of the system.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2023.

Builds on

19 of 66 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  5. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  6. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  7. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  8. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  9. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
  10. 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 281
  11. 2013The Complexity of Decentralized Control of Markov Decision Processescited by 225
  12. 2018Graph Convolutional Reinforcement Learningcited by 148
7 more
  1. 2019Global Optimality Guarantees For Policy Gradient Methodscited by 146
  2. 2021Federated Reinforcement Learning: Techniques, Applications, and Open Challengescited by 79
  3. 2020OR-Gym: A Reinforcement Learning Library for Operations Research Problemscited by 50
  4. 2022Deep Inventory Managementcited by 22
  5. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning with Shallow Controllers: An Experimental Application to PID Tuningcited by 18
  6. 2019On Policy Gradientscited by 6
  7. 2020Towards Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.