mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Saliency strikes back: How filtering out high frequencies improves white-box explanations

arXiv 2307.09591 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2023cs.AI cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attribution methods correspond to a class of explainability methods (XAI) that aim to assess how individual inputs contribute to a model's decision-making process. We have identified a significant limitation in one type of attribution methods, known as ``white-box" methods. Although highly efficient, as we will show, these methods rely on a gradient signal that is often contaminated by high-frequency artifacts. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a new approach called "FORGrad". This simple method effectively filters out these high-frequency artifacts using optimal cut-off frequencies tailored to the unique characteristics of each model architecture. Our findings show that FORGrad consistently enhances the performance of already existing white-box methods, enabling them to compete effectively with more accurate yet computationally demanding "black-box" methods. We anticipate that our research will foster broader adoption of simpler and more efficient white-box methods for explainability, offering a better balance between faithfulness and computational efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2023.

Builds on

46 of 54 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  11. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  12. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
34 more
  1. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  3. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  4. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  5. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  6. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  7. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  8. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  9. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  10. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  11. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  12. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
  13. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
  14. 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 156
  15. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  16. 2019Sanity Checks for Saliency Metricscited by 119
  17. 2021HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanationscited by 105
  18. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  19. 2019When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions Failcited by 92
  20. 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 87
  21. 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
  22. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
  23. 2022Rethinking Stability for Attribution-based Explanationscited by 52
  24. 2021Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanationscited by 47
  25. 2019Why are Saliency Maps Noisy? Cause of and Solution to Noisy Saliency Mapscited by 34
  26. 2022Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measurecited by 33
  27. 2022Towards Better Understanding Attribution Methodscited by 28
  28. 2020How Good is your Explanation? Algorithmic Stability Measures to Assess the Quality of Explanations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
  29. 2020Investigating Saturation Effects in Integrated Gradientscited by 22
  30. 2018Noise-adding Methods of Saliency Map as Series of Higher Order Partial Derivativecited by 11
  31. 2023Learning with Explanation Constraintscited by 8
  32. 2020Interpreting Deep Neural Networks with Relative Sectional Propagation by Analyzing Comparative Gradients and Hostile Activationscited by 7
  33. 2022FD-CAM: Improving Faithfulness and Discriminability of Visual Explanation for CNNscited by 7
  34. 2023On the coalitional decomposition of parameters of interestcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.