mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

National Origin Discrimination in Deep-learning-powered Automated Resume Screening

arXiv 2307.08624 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many companies and organizations have started to use some form of AIenabled auto mated tools to assist in their hiring process, e.g. screening resumes, interviewing candi dates, performance evaluation. While those AI tools have greatly improved human re source operations efficiency and provided conveniences to job seekers as well, there are increasing concerns on unfair treatment to candidates, caused by underlying bias in AI systems. Laws around equal opportunity and fairness, like GDPR, CCPA, are introduced or under development, in attempt to regulate AI. However, it is difficult to implement AI regulations in practice, as technologies are constantly advancing and the risk perti nent to their applications can fail to be recognized. This study examined deep learning methods, a recent technology breakthrough, with focus on their application to automated resume screening. One impressive performance of deep learning methods is the represen tation of individual words as lowdimensional numerical vectors, called word embedding, which are learned from aggregated global wordword cooccurrence statistics from a cor pus, like Wikipedia or Google news. The resulting word representations possess interest ing linear substructures of the word vector space and have been widely used in down stream tasks, like resume screening. However, word embedding inherits and reinforces the stereotyping from the training corpus, as deep learning models essentially learn a probability distribution of words and their relations from history data. Our study finds out that if we rely on such deeplearningpowered automated resume screening tools, it may lead to decisions favoring or disfavoring certain demographic groups and raise eth ical, even legal, concerns. To address the issue, we developed bias mitigation method. Extensive experiments on real candidate resumes are conducted to validate our study

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2023.

Builds on

11 of 27 references.

References · 11

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  4. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  5. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
  6. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
  7. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
  8. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 174
  9. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  10. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  11. 2019Man is to Person as Woman is to Location: Measuring Gender Bias in Named Entity Recognitioncited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.