FedCME: Client Matching and Classifier Exchanging to Handle Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data heterogeneity across clients is one of the key challenges in Federated Learning (FL), which may slow down the global model convergence and even weaken global model performance. Most existing approaches tackle the heterogeneity by constraining local model updates through reference to global information provided by the server. This can alleviate the performance degradation on the aggregated global model. Different from existing methods, we focus the information exchange between clients, which could also enhance the effectiveness of local training and lead to generate a high-performance global model. Concretely, we propose a novel FL framework named FedCME by client matching and classifier exchanging. In FedCME, clients with large differences in data distribution will be matched in pairs, and then the corresponding pair of clients will exchange their classifiers at the stage of local training in an intermediate moment. Since the local data determines the local model training direction, our method can correct update direction of classifiers and effectively alleviate local update divergence. Besides, we propose feature alignment to enhance the training of the feature extractor. Experimental results demonstrate that FedCME performs better than FedAvg, FedProx, MOON and FedRS on popular federated learning benchmarks including FMNIST and CIFAR10, in the case where data are heterogeneous.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2023.
Builds on
29 of 35 references.
References · 29
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
- 2020Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 612
17 more
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 566
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 555
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
- 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 347
- 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 303
- 2021FedDG: Federated Domain Generalization on Medical Image Segmentation via Episodic Learning in Continuous Frequency Spacecited by 284
- 2021No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 241
- 2016Asynchronous Stochastic Gradient Descent with Delay Compensationcited by 98
- 2020From Local SGD to Local Fixed-Point Methods for Federated Learningcited by 74
- 2021FedLab: A Flexible Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 54
- 2019Federated Learning for Ranking Browser History Suggestionscited by 23
- 2020Particle Swarm Optimized Federated Learning For Industrial IoT and Smart City Servicescited by 18
- 2018CIFAR10 to Compare Visual Recognition Performance between Deep Neural Networks and Humanscited by 14
- 2023Optimization Design for Federated Learning in Heterogeneous 6G Networkscited by 7
- 2013Efficient Distance Metric Learning by Adaptive Sampling and Mini-Batch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD)cited by 4
- 2014Cosine Similarity Measure According to a Convex Cost Functioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.