mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Magnetic Field-Based Reward Shaping for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2307.08033 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) is an interesting extension of the traditional RL framework, where the dynamic environment and reward sparsity can cause conventional learning algorithms to fail. Reward shaping is a practical approach to improving sample efficiency by embedding human domain knowledge into the learning process. Existing reward shaping methods for goal-conditioned RL are typically built on distance metrics with a linear and isotropic distribution, which may fail to provide sufficient information about the ever-changing environment with high complexity. This paper proposes a novel magnetic field-based reward shaping (MFRS) method for goal-conditioned RL tasks with dynamic target and obstacles. Inspired by the physical properties of magnets, we consider the target and obstacles as permanent magnets and establish the reward function according to the intensity values of the magnetic field generated by these magnets. The nonlinear and anisotropic distribution of the magnetic field intensity can provide more accessible and conducive information about the optimization landscape, thus introducing a more sophisticated magnetic reward compared to the distance-based setting. Further, we transform our magnetic reward to the form of potential-based reward shaping by learning a secondary potential function concurrently to ensure the optimal policy invariance of our method. Experiments results in both simulated and real-world robotic manipulation tasks demonstrate that MFRS outperforms relevant existing methods and effectively improves the sample efficiency of RL algorithms in goal-conditioned tasks with various dynamics of the target and obstacles.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2023.

Builds on

26 of 69 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  4. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  5. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  6. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  7. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
  8. 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
  9. 2018Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learning: Challenging Robotics Environments and Request for Researchcited by 256
  10. 2019Goal-conditioned Imitation Learningcited by 159
  11. 2015Learning Continuous Control Policies by Stochastic Value Gradientscited by 156
  12. 2022Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: Problems and Solutionscited by 145
14 more
  1. 2018Unsupervised Control Through Non-Parametric Discriminative Rewardscited by 102
  2. 2020Maximum Entropy Gain Exploration for Long Horizon Multi-goal Reinforcement Learningcited by 100
  3. 2020Automatic Curriculum Learning through Value Disagreementcited by 86
  4. 2018The Laplacian in RL: Learning Representations with Efficient Approximationscited by 83
  5. 2019Keeping Your Distance: Solving Sparse Reward Tasks Using Self-Balancing Shaped Rewardscited by 76
  6. 2019Dynamical Distance Learning for Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised Skill Discoverycited by 65
  7. 2018Learning Actionable Representations with Goal-Conditioned Policiescited by 53
  8. 2021Adversarial Intrinsic Motivation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  9. 2020Lifelong Incremental Reinforcement Learning with Online Bayesian Inferencecited by 23
  10. 2021Prioritized Experience-based Reinforcement Learning with Human Guidance for Autonomous Drivingcited by 21
  11. 2018Reinforcement Learning and Deep Learning based Lateral Control for Autonomous Drivingcited by 17
  12. 2022A Dirichlet Process Mixture of Robust Task Models for Scalable Lifelong Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
  13. 2018Fidelity-based Probabilistic Q-learning for Control of Quantum Systemscited by 10
  14. 2021Imaginary Hindsight Experience Replay: Curious Model-based Learning for Sparse Reward Taskscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.