mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prawn Morphometrics and Weight Estimation from Images using Deep Learning for Landmark Localization

arXiv 2307.07732 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate weight estimation and morphometric analyses are useful in aquaculture for optimizing feeding, predicting harvest yields, identifying desirable traits for selective breeding, grading processes, and monitoring the health status of production animals. However, the collection of phenotypic data through traditional manual approaches at industrial scales and in real-time is time-consuming, labour-intensive, and prone to errors. Digital imaging of individuals and subsequent training of prediction models using Deep Learning (DL) has the potential to rapidly and accurately acquire phenotypic data from aquaculture species. In this study, we applied a novel DL approach to automate weight estimation and morphometric analysis using the black tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon) as a model crustacean. The DL approach comprises two main components: a feature extraction module that efficiently combines low-level and high-level features using the Kronecker product operation; followed by a landmark localization module that then uses these features to predict the coordinates of key morphological points (landmarks) on the prawn body. Once these landmarks were extracted, weight was estimated using a weight regression module based on the extracted landmarks using a fully connected network. For morphometric analyses, we utilized the detected landmarks to derive five important prawn traits. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was also used to identify landmark-derived distances, which were found to be highly correlated with shape features such as body length, and width. We evaluated our approach on a large dataset of 8164 images of the Black tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon) collected from Australian farms. Our experimental results demonstrate that the novel DL approach outperforms existing DL methods in terms of accuracy, robustness, and efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2023.

Builds on

13 of 33 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  5. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  6. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,200
  7. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  8. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
  9. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learningcited by 97
  10. 2020A Realistic Fish-Habitat Dataset to Evaluate Algorithms for Underwater Visual Analysiscited by 57
  11. 2022Computer Vision and Deep Learning for Fish Classification in Underwater Habitats: A Surveycited by 14
  12. 2020Internet of Underwater Things and Big Marine Data Analytics -- A Comprehensive Surveycited by 11
1 more
  1. 2019Automatic Weight Estimation of Harvested Fish from Imagescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.