Automatic Weight Estimation of Harvested Fish from Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Approximately 2,500 weights and corresponding images of harvested Lates calcarifer (Asian seabass or barramundi) were collected at three different locations in Queensland, Australia. Two instances of the LinkNet-34 segmentation Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were trained. The first one was trained on 200 manually segmented fish masks with excluded fins and tails. The second was trained on 100 whole-fish masks. The two CNNs were applied to the rest of the images and yielded automatically segmented masks. The one-factor and two-factor simple mathematical weight-from-area models were fitted on 1072 area-weight pairs from the first two locations, where area values were extracted from the automatically segmented masks. When applied to 1,400 test images (from the third location), the one-factor whole-fish mask model achieved the best mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), MAPE=4.36%. Direct weight-from-image regression CNNs were also trained, where the no-fins based CNN performed best on the test images with MAPE=4.28%.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Applications of Deep Learning in Fish Habitat Monitoring: A Tutorial and Surveycited by 4
- 2022How to Track and Segment Fish without Human Annotations: A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Approachcited by 1
- 2023Prawn Morphometrics and Weight Estimation from Images using Deep Learning for Landmark Localizationcited by 0
- 2023Prawn Morphometrics and Weight Estimation from Images using Deep Learning for Landmark Localization15 Jul 2023
- 2022How to Track and Segment Fish without Human Annotations: A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Approach23 Aug 2022
- 2022Applications of Deep Learning in Fish Habitat Monitoring: A Tutorial and Survey11 Jun 2022