Smooth Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Algorithms via Padding-and-Permuting Fingerprinting Codes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fingerprinting arguments, first introduced by Bun, Ullman, and Vadhan (STOC 2014), are the most widely used method for establishing lower bounds on the sample complexity or error of approximately differentially private (DP) algorithms. Still, there are many problems in differential privacy for which we don't know suitable lower bounds, and even for problems that we do, the lower bounds are not smooth, and usually become vacuous when the error is larger than some threshold. We present a new framework and tools to generate smooth lower bounds on the sample complexity of differentially private algorithms satisfying very weak accuracy. We illustrate the applicability of our method by providing new lower bounds in various settings: 1. A tight lower bound for DP averaging in the low-accuracy regime, which in particular implies a lower bound for the private 1-cluster problem introduced by Nissim, Stemmer, and Vadhan (PODS 2016). 2. A lower bound on the additive error of DP algorithms for approximate k-means clustering and general (k,z)-clustering, as a function of the multiplicative error, which is tight for a constant multiplication error. 3. A lower bound for estimating the top singular vector of a matrix under DP in low-accuracy regimes, which is a special case of DP subspace estimation studied by Singhal and Steinke (NeurIPS 2021). Our main technique is to apply a padding-and-permuting transformation to a fingerprinting code. However, rather than proving our results using a black-box access to an existing fingerprinting code (e.g., Tardos' code), we develop a new fingerprinting lemma that is stronger than those of Dwork et al. (FOCS 2015) and Bun et al. (SODA 2017), and prove our lower bounds directly from the lemma. Our lemma, in particular, gives a simpler fingerprinting code construction with optimal rate (up to polylogarithmic factors) that is of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.
Builds on
24 of 50 references.
References · 24
- 2017Finite Sample Differentially Private Confidence Intervalscited by 103
- 2018Privately Learning High-Dimensional Distributionscited by 103
- 2013Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacycited by 81
- 2015Between Pure and Approximate Differential Privacycited by 55
- 2021Private and polynomial time algorithms for learning Gaussians and beyondcited by 39
- 2014Interactive Fingerprinting Codes and the Hardness of Preventing False Discoverycited by 35
- 2014Preventing False Discovery in Interactive Data Analysis is Hardcited by 34
- 2020Differentially Private Clustering: Tight Approximation Ratioscited by 34
- 2021FriendlyCore: Practical Differentially Private Aggregationcited by 34
- 2021A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussianscited by 34
- 2017Tight Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Selectioncited by 33
- 2021The Price of Differential Privacy under Continual Observationcited by 32
12 more
- 2022New Lower Bounds for Private Estimation and a Generalized Fingerprinting Lemmacited by 32
- 2020Private Query Release Assisted by Public Datacited by 27
- 2016Make Up Your Mind: The Price of Online Queries in Differential Privacycited by 26
- 2021Tight and Robust Private Mean Estimation with Few Userscited by 26
- 2018Differentially Private k-Means with Constant Multiplicative Errorcited by 22
- 2023Score Attack: A Lower Bound Technique for Optimal Differentially Private Learningcited by 21
- 2016Locating a Small Cluster Privatelycited by 20
- 2017Clustering Algorithms for the Centralized and Local Modelscited by 18
- 2021Differentially-Private Clustering of Easy Instancescited by 17
- 2021Privately Learning Subspacescited by 16
- 2023A Bias-Accuracy-Privacy Trilemma for Statistical Estimationcited by 12
- 2022Differentially Private Sampling from Distributionscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023Better and Simpler Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Statistical Estimationcited by 16
- 2024Lower Bounds for Private Estimation of Gaussian Covariance Matrices under All Reasonable Parameter Regimescited by 9
- 2024Fingerprinting Codes Meet Geometry: Improved Lower Bounds for Private Query Release and Adaptive Data Analysiscited by 3
- 2024On Differentially Private Subspace Estimation in a Distribution-Free Settingcited by 1
- 2026Minimax and Adaptive Covariance Matrix Estimation under Differential Privacycited by 1
- 2025Bayesian Perspective on Memorization and Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2025Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shiftcited by 0
- 2026A Van Trees Lower Bound for Fully Interactive Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026A Van Trees Lower Bound for Fully Interactive Differentially Private Federated Learning19 May 2026
- 2026Minimax and Adaptive Covariance Matrix Estimation under Differential Privacy20 Mar 2026
- 2025Lower Bounds for Public-Private Learning under Distribution Shift23 Jul 2025
- 2025Bayesian Perspective on Memorization and Reconstruction29 May 2025
- 2024Fingerprinting Codes Meet Geometry: Improved Lower Bounds for Private Query Release and Adaptive Data Analysis18 Dec 2024
- 2024Lower Bounds for Private Estimation of Gaussian Covariance Matrices under All Reasonable Parameter Regimes26 Apr 2024
- 2024On Differentially Private Subspace Estimation in a Distribution-Free Setting9 Feb 2024
- 2023Better and Simpler Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Statistical Estimation10 Oct 2023