mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Ensemble learning for blending gridded satellite and gauge-measured precipitation data

arXiv 2307.06840 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2023cs.LG physics.ao-ph stat.APcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Regression algorithms are regularly used for improving the accuracy of satellite precipitation products. In this context, satellite precipitation and topography data are the predictor variables, and gauged-measured precipitation data are the dependent variables. Alongside this, it is increasingly recognised in many fields that combinations of algorithms through ensemble learning can lead to substantial predictive performance improvements. Still, a sufficient number of ensemble learners for improving the accuracy of satellite precipitation products and their large-scale comparison are currently missing from the literature. In this study, we work towards filling in this specific gap by proposing 11 new ensemble learners in the field and by extensively comparing them. We apply the ensemble learners to monthly data from the PERSIANN (Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks) and IMERG (Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM) gridded datasets that span over a 15-year period and over the entire the contiguous United States (CONUS). We also use gauge-measured precipitation data from the Global Historical Climatology Network monthly database, version 2 (GHCNm). The ensemble learners combine the predictions of six machine learning regression algorithms (base learners), namely the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), multivariate adaptive polynomial splines (poly-MARS), random forests (RF), gradient boosting machines (GBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and Bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNN), and each of them is based on a different combiner. The combiners include the equal-weight combiner, the median combiner, two best learners and seven variants of a sophisticated stacking method. The latter stacks a regression algorithm on top of the base learners to combine their independent predictions...

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 123 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2023.

Builds on

14 of 123 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 171
  3. 2019Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveriescited by 165
  4. 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
  5. 2017Using stacking to average Bayesian predictive distributionscited by 39
  6. 2022Forecast combinations: an over 50-year reviewcited by 34
  7. 2022A review of predictive uncertainty estimation with machine learningcited by 29
  8. 2014The Evolution of Boosting Algorithms - From Machine Learning to Statistical Modellingcited by 18
  9. 2020Boosting algorithms in energy research: A systematic reviewcited by 13
  10. 2022A review of machine learning concepts and methods for addressing challenges in probabilistic hydrological post-processing and forecastingcited by 12
  11. 2020Hydrological time series forecasting using simple combinations: Big data testing and investigations on one-year ahead river flow predictabilitycited by 10
  12. 2022Comparison of machine learning algorithms for merging gridded satellite and earth-observed precipitation datacited by 6
2 more
  1. 2023Merging satellite and gauge-measured precipitation using LightGBM with an emphasis on extreme quantilescited by 5
  2. 2022Comparison of tree-based ensemble algorithms for merging satellite and earth-observed precipitation data at the daily time scalecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.

3 papers.