mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Merging satellite and gauge-measured precipitation using LightGBM with an emphasis on extreme quantiles

arXiv 2302.03606 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2023eess.SP cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowing the actual precipitation in space and time is critical in hydrological modelling applications, yet the spatial coverage with rain gauge stations is limited due to economic constraints. Gridded satellite precipitation datasets offer an alternative option for estimating the actual precipitation by covering uniformly large areas, albeit related estimates are not accurate. To improve precipitation estimates, machine learning is applied to merge rain gauge-based measurements and gridded satellite precipitation products. In this context, observed precipitation plays the role of the dependent variable, while satellite data play the role of predictor variables. Random forests is the dominant machine learning algorithm in relevant applications. In those spatial predictions settings, point predictions (mostly the mean or the median of the conditional distribution) of the dependent variable are issued. The aim of the manuscript is to solve the problem of probabilistic prediction of precipitation with an emphasis on extreme quantiles in spatial interpolation settings. Here we propose, issuing probabilistic spatial predictions of precipitation using Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). LightGBM is a boosting algorithm, highlighted by prize-winning entries in prediction and forecasting competitions. To assess LightGBM, we contribute a large-scale application that includes merging daily precipitation measurements in contiguous US with PERSIANN and GPM-IMERG satellite precipitation data. We focus on extreme quantiles of the probability distribution of the dependent variable, where LightGBM outperforms quantile regression forests (QRF, a variant of random forests) in terms of quantile score at extreme quantiles. Our study offers understanding of probabilistic predictions in spatial settings using machine learning.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2023.

Builds on

11 of 90 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  3. 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 171
  4. 2022A review of predictive uncertainty estimation with machine learningcited by 29
  5. 2020Boosting algorithms in energy research: A systematic reviewcited by 13
  6. 2022A review of machine learning concepts and methods for addressing challenges in probabilistic hydrological post-processing and forecastingcited by 12
  7. 2020Hydrological time series forecasting using simple combinations: Big data testing and investigations on one-year ahead river flow predictabilitycited by 10
  8. 2022Comparison of machine learning algorithms for merging gridded satellite and earth-observed precipitation datacited by 6
  9. 2022Hydrological post-processing for predicting extreme quantilescited by 5
  10. 2022Comparison of tree-based ensemble algorithms for merging satellite and earth-observed precipitation data at the daily time scalecited by 4
  11. 2022Time series features for supporting hydrometeorological explorations and predictions in ungauged locations using large datasetscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

5 papers.