mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Piecing Together Clues: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Detective Skills of Large Language Models

arXiv 2307.05113 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detectives frequently engage in information detection and reasoning simultaneously when making decisions across various cases, especially when confronted with a vast amount of information. With the rapid development of large language models~(LLMs), evaluating how these models identify key information and reason to solve questions becomes increasingly relevant. We introduces the DetectBench, a reading comprehension dataset designed to assess a model's ability to jointly ability in key information detection and multi-hop reasoning when facing complex and implicit information. The DetectBench comprises 3,928 questions, each paired with a paragraph averaging 190 tokens in length. To enhance model's detective skills, we propose the Detective Thinking Framework. These methods encourage models to identify all possible clues within the context before reasoning. Our experiments reveal that existing models perform poorly in both information detection and multi-hop reasoning. However, the Detective Thinking Framework approach alleviates this issue.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2023.

Builds on

20 of 33 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  7. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  8. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  9. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  10. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 387
  11. 2019Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 300
  12. 2022Unified Structure Generation for Universal Information Extractioncited by 220
8 more
  1. 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
  2. 2021FEVEROUS: Fact Extraction and VERification Over Unstructured and Structured informationcited by 166
  3. 2020Open-Domain Question Answering Goes Conversational via Question Rewritingcited by 147
  4. 2021TopiOCQA: Open-domain Conversational Question Answering with Topic Switchingcited by 95
  5. 2023Xiezhi: An Ever-Updating Benchmark for Holistic Domain Knowledge Evaluationcited by 52
  6. 2022INSCIT: Information-Seeking Conversations with Mixed-Initiative Interactionscited by 27
  7. 2021UQuAD1.0: Development of an Urdu Question Answering Training Data for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 6
  8. 2022Contextual embedding and model weighting by fusing domain knowledge on Biomedical Question Answeringcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024DetectiveQA: Evaluating Long-Context Reasoning on Detective Novels
  2. 2024Seemingly Plausible Distractors in Multi-Hop Reasoning: Are Large Language Models Attentive Readers?
  3. 2022True Detective: A Deep Abductive Reasoning Benchmark Undoable for GPT-3 and Challenging for GPT-4
  4. 2025TurnaboutLLM: A Deductive Reasoning Benchmark from Detective Games
  5. 2025NovelHopQA: Diagnosing Multi-Hop Reasoning Failures in Long Narrative Contexts
  6. 2026From Reasoning Depth to Reasoning Breadth: Evaluating Multi-Point Associative Reasoning in Large Language Models
  7. 2023Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models
  8. 2025From Passive to Active Reasoning: Can Large Language Models Ask the Right Questions under Incomplete Information?