mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating Calibration Bias Without Fixed Attribute Grouping for Improved Fairness in Medical Imaging Analysis

arXiv 2307.01738 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthy deployment of deep learning medical imaging models into real-world clinical practice requires that they be calibrated. However, models that are well calibrated overall can still be poorly calibrated for a sub-population, potentially resulting in a clinician unwittingly making poor decisions for this group based on the recommendations of the model. Although methods have been shown to successfully mitigate biases across subgroups in terms of model accuracy, this work focuses on the open problem of mitigating calibration biases in the context of medical image analysis. Our method does not require subgroup attributes during training, permitting the flexibility to mitigate biases for different choices of sensitive attributes without re-training. To this end, we propose a novel two-stage method: Cluster-Focal to first identify poorly calibrated samples, cluster them into groups, and then introduce group-wise focal loss to improve calibration bias. We evaluate our method on skin lesion classification with the public HAM10000 dataset, and on predicting future lesional activity for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. In addition to considering traditional sensitive attributes (e.g. age, sex) with demographic subgroups, we also consider biases among groups with different image-derived attributes, such as lesion load, which are required in medical image analysis. Our results demonstrate that our method effectively controls calibration error in the worst-performing subgroups while preserving prediction performance, and outperforming recent baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2023.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
  4. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  5. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  6. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
  7. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  8. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  9. 2020Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimationcited by 100
  10. 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imagingcited by 66

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.