mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning Properly Resolved?

arXiv 2307.00547 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the nature of risk management in learning applicable policies, risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RSRL) has been realized as an important direction. RSRL is usually achieved by learning risk-sensitive objectives characterized by various risk measures, under the framework of distributional reinforcement learning. However, it remains unclear if the distributional Bellman operator properly optimizes the RSRL objective in the sense of risk measures. In this paper, we prove that the existing RSRL methods do not achieve unbiased optimization and cannot guarantee optimality or even improvements regarding risk measures over accumulated return distributions. To remedy this issue, we further propose a novel algorithm, namely Trajectory Q-Learning (TQL), for RSRL problems with provable policy improvement towards the optimal policy. Based on our new learning architecture, we are free to introduce a general and practical implementation for different risk measures to learn disparate risk-sensitive policies. In the experiments, we verify the learnability of our algorithm and show how our method effectively achieves better performances toward risk-sensitive objectives.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2023.

Builds on

21 of 42 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  3. 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
  4. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  5. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  6. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
  7. 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
  8. 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
  9. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
  10. 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 162
  11. 2014Algorithms for CVaR Optimization in MDPscited by 98
  12. 2021Conservative Offline Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 78
9 more
  1. 2015Policy Gradient for Coherent Risk Measurescited by 74
  2. 2021Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  3. 2019Being Optimistic to Be Conservative: Quickly Learning a CVaR Policycited by 63
  4. 2019Statistics and Samples in Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 62
  5. 2020Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in Regretcited by 57
  6. 2019Worst Cases Policy Gradientscited by 52
  7. 2022One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  8. 2020Markov Decision Processes with Recursive Risk Measurescited by 17
  9. 2022PerfectDou: Dominating DouDizhu with Perfect Information Distillationcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.