Diagnosis Uncertain Models For Medical Risk Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a patient risk models which has access to patient features such as vital signs, lab values, and prior history but does not have access to a patient's diagnosis. For example, this occurs in a model deployed at intake time for triage purposes. We show that such `all-cause' risk models have good generalization across diagnoses but have a predictable failure mode. When the same lab/vital/history profiles can result from diagnoses with different risk profiles (e.g. E.coli vs. MRSA) the risk estimate is a probability weighted average of these two profiles. This leads to an under-estimation of risk for rare but highly risky diagnoses. We propose a fix for this problem by explicitly modeling the uncertainty in risk prediction coming from uncertainty in patient diagnoses. This gives practitioners an interpretable way to understand patient risk beyond a single risk number.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2023.
Builds on
7 of 38 references.
References · 7
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
- 2017Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series datacited by 290
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
- 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
Built on by
Not cited yet.