mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining f-Divergence-Based Regularization via Local Curvature and Sharpness-Aware Minimization

arXiv 2609.09367 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Divergence-based regularization and Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) are two prominent approaches for improving generalization in deep learning, both motivated by robustness to perturbations. However, their relationship has remained largely unexplored. Building on classical second-order expansions of f-divergences, we show that the two methods are locally consistent under parameter-space perturbations: both induce curvature-sensitive penalties, with divergence regularization yielding a Fisher-weighted quadratic form and SAM penalizing sharpness through the dominant Hessian eigenvalue. For negative log-likelihood objectives with exponential-family output distributions, this correspondence becomes especially transparent, since the Fisher and Gauss-Newton matrices coincide. We further show that the same local geometric perspective extends to input-space perturbations, where divergence-based regularization is defined through transformations of the input. In this setting, the regularizer induces a pullback quadratic form on the input space, providing a more general perturbation framework than standard SAM while preserving the same local sensitivity interpretation. To validate the analysis empirically, we use the asymmetric α-skew Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) family as a controlled testbed. Its local curvature coefficient scales as α(1-α) and is maximized at the symmetric point α=tfrac12, which recovers the standard JSD. Loss-landscape visualizations in the input-perturbation regime show that stronger induced curvature penalization is associated with flatter local minima. Experiments on four benchmark datasets further demonstrate that both accuracy and negative log-likelihood are consistently best near this regime of maximal curvature penalization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

16 of 24 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  4. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  5. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  6. 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 435
  7. 2022Fisher SAM: Information Geometry and Sharpness Aware Minimisationcited by 84
  8. 2022How Does Sharpness-Aware Minimization Minimize Sharpness?cited by 64
  9. 2015Distributional Smoothing with Virtual Adversarial Trainingcited by 61
  10. 2020When Optimizing f-divergence is Robust with Label Noisecited by 44
  11. 2023SAM operates far from home: eigenvalue regularization as a dynamical phenomenoncited by 24
  12. 2021Adversarial Robustness via Fisher-Rao Regularizationcited by 19
4 more
  1. 2023CR-SAM: Curvature Regularized Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 10
  2. 2023Learning Fair Classifiers via Min-Max F-divergence Regularizationcited by 8
  3. 2024X-SHIELD: Regularization for eXplainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 3
  4. 2025Regularization via f-Divergence: An Application to Multi-Oxide Spectroscopic Analysiscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.