mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantic Positive Pairs for Enhancing Visual Representation Learning of Instance Discrimination Methods

arXiv 2306.16122 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2023cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised learning algorithms (SSL) based on instance discrimination have shown promising results, performing competitively or even outperforming supervised learning counterparts in some downstream tasks. Such approaches employ data augmentation to create two views of the same instance (i.e., positive pairs) and encourage the model to learn good representations by attracting these views closer in the embedding space without collapsing to the trivial solution. However, data augmentation is limited in representing positive pairs, and the repulsion process between the instances during contrastive learning may discard important features for instances that have similar categories. To address this issue, we propose an approach to identify those images with similar semantic content and treat them as positive instances, thereby reducing the chance of discarding important features during representation learning and increasing the richness of the latent representation. Our approach is generic and could work with any self-supervised instance discrimination frameworks such as MoCo and SimSiam. To evaluate our method, we run experiments on three benchmark datasets: ImageNet, STL-10 and CIFAR-10 with different instance discrimination SSL approaches. The experimental results show that our approach consistently outperforms the baseline methods across all three datasets; for instance, we improve upon the vanilla MoCo-v2 by 4.1% on ImageNet under a linear evaluation protocol over 800 epochs. We also report results on semi-supervised learning, transfer learning on downstream tasks, and object detection.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2023.

Builds on

42 of 50 references.

References · 42

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  6. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  7. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  9. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  10. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  11. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  12. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
30 more
  1. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  2. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  3. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  4. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  5. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
  6. 2019Self-labelling via simultaneous clustering and representation learningcited by 528
  7. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 424
  8. 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 402
  9. 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 356
  10. 2020SCAN: Learning to Classify Images without Labelscited by 352
  11. 2021With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 326
  12. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 226
  13. 2020Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellationcited by 119
  14. 2021Contrastive Learning with Stronger Augmentationscited by 100
  15. 2020Learning Representations by Predicting Bags of Visual Wordscited by 73
  16. 2020OBoW: Online Bag-of-Visual-Words Generation for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 65
  17. 2022Twin Contrastive Learning for Online Clusteringcited by 60
  18. 2020Conditional Negative Sampling for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 57
  19. 2021Reconsidering Representation Alignment for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 57
  20. 2021Incremental False Negative Detection for Contrastive Learningcited by 48
  21. 2022HCSC: Hierarchical Contrastive Selective Codingcited by 43
  22. 2022UniVIP: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Visual Pre-trainingcited by 31
  23. 2022Interpolation-based Contrastive Learning for Few-Label Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 23
  24. 2017Satellite Image-based Localization via Learned Embeddingscited by 22
  25. 2023Soft Neighbors are Positive Supporters in Contrastive Visual Representation Learningcited by 18
  26. 2022Semantics-Consistent Feature Search for Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 8
  27. 2023SemPPL: Predicting pseudo-labels for better contrastive representationscited by 6
  28. 2023HMSN: Hyperbolic Self-Supervised Learning by Clustering with Ideal Prototypescited by 6
  29. 2021Hyperspherically Regularized Networks for Self-Supervisioncited by 4
  30. 2023S-JEA: Stacked Joint Embedding Architectures for Self-Supervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.