mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Impact of Semantic Pairs on Self-Supervised Representation Learning

arXiv 2510.08722 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instance discrimination learns visual representations by treating different augmented views of the same image as positive pairs. While this encourages invariance to handcrafted transformations, same-image positives can preserve nuisance correlations such as background, texture, illumination, and object-specific details. Semantic positive pairs, i.e., different same-class instances, may reduce these correlations by presenting objects across diverse contexts. However, previous studies often combine semantic pairs with augmented positives or false neighbors (i.e., incorrectly mapped semantic pairs), making it difficult to isolate the effect of semantic pairing. We present a controlled empirical study of semantic positive pairs for self-supervised representation learning. From ImageNet-1K, we construct two matched subsets: an augmented-pair baseline and a manually curated semantic-pair dataset with the same class composition and training-pair count. We use these datasets to compare representative contrastive and non-contrastive SSL methods under matched training conditions. Across transfer learning and object detection evaluations, semantic-pair pretraining consistently improves generalisation over augmented-pair pretraining. Additional ablations show that semantic pairs induce invariances beyond the standard transformation pipeline. Among the evaluated methods, contrastive learning benefits most strongly from semantic pairs, with SimCLR showing the largest relative improvement. These results clarify the role of semantic positive pairs in SSL and provide guidance for selecting and designing frameworks that can exploit semantic pair information effectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.

Builds on

38 of 46 references.

References · 38

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  6. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  7. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  8. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  9. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  10. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  11. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  12. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
26 more
  1. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  2. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  3. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 628
  4. 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 402
  5. 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 356
  6. 2021With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 326
  7. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  8. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 226
  9. 2020Demystifying Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning: Invariances, Augmentations and Dataset Biasescited by 143
  10. 2020Boosting Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning with False Negative Cancellationcited by 119
  11. 2021Contrastive Learning with Stronger Augmentationscited by 100
  12. 2020Learning Representations by Predicting Bags of Visual Wordscited by 73
  13. 2020OBoW: Online Bag-of-Visual-Words Generation for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 65
  14. 2021Mean Shift for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 65
  15. 2020Conditional Negative Sampling for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 57
  16. 2022Contrastive Learning Can Find An Optimal Basis For Approximately View-Invariant Functionscited by 32
  17. 2022Leverage Your Local and Global Representations: A New Self-Supervised Learning Strategycited by 30
  18. 2023Do SSL Models Have D'ej`a Vu? A Case of Unintended Memorization in Self-supervised Learningcited by 19
  19. 2025I-Con: A Unifying Framework for Representation Learningcited by 16
  20. 2025Position: An Empirically Grounded Identifiability Theory Will Accelerate Self-Supervised Learning Researchcited by 9
  21. 2024Contrastive Learning with Synthetic Positivescited by 6
  22. 2024Generalization Gap in Data Augmentation: Insights from Illuminationcited by 4
  23. 2022CoDo: Contrastive Learning with Downstream Background Invariance for Detectioncited by 3
  24. 2024LeOCLR: Leveraging Original Images for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 3
  25. 2023Semantic Positive Pairs for Enhancing Visual Representation Learning of Instance Discrimination Methodscited by 2
  26. 2025A Survey on Data Curation for Visual Contrastive Learning: Why Crafting Effective Positive and Negative Pairs Matterscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.