mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Safe Reinforcement Learning with Dead-Ends Avoidance and Recovery

arXiv 2306.13944 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Safety is one of the main challenges in applying reinforcement learning to realistic environmental tasks. To ensure safety during and after training process, existing methods tend to adopt overly conservative policy to avoid unsafe situations. However, overly conservative policy severely hinders the exploration, and makes the algorithms substantially less rewarding. In this paper, we propose a method to construct a boundary that discriminates safe and unsafe states. The boundary we construct is equivalent to distinguishing dead-end states, indicating the maximum extent to which safe exploration is guaranteed, and thus has minimum limitation on exploration. Similar to Recovery Reinforcement Learning, we utilize a decoupled RL framework to learn two policies, (1) a task policy that only considers improving the task performance, and (2) a recovery policy that maximizes safety. The recovery policy and a corresponding safety critic are pretrained on an offline dataset, in which the safety critic evaluates upper bound of safety in each state as awareness of environmental safety for the agent. During online training, a behavior correction mechanism is adopted, ensuring the agent to interact with the environment using safe actions only. Finally, experiments of continuous control tasks demonstrate that our approach has better task performance with less safety violations than state-of-the-art algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2023.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  3. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
  4. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
  5. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
  6. 2017A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 483
  7. 2019End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Taskscited by 289
  8. 2018Learning to Drive in a Daycited by 273
  9. 2020Projection-Based Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 203
  10. 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 175
  11. 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 116
  12. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 115
10 more
  1. 2020Learning to Walk in the Real World with Minimal Human Effortcited by 111
  2. 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning by Imagining the Near Futurecited by 67
  3. 2023State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 55
  4. 2019Quantile QT-Opt for Risk-Aware Vision-Based Robotic Graspingcited by 29
  5. 2020Reachability-based Trajectory Safeguard (RTS): A Safe and Fast Reinforcement Learning Safety Layer for Continuous Controlcited by 28
  6. 2021Medical Dead-ends and Learning to Identify High-risk States and Treatmentscited by 28
  7. 2021Decoupled Exploration and Exploitation Policies for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  8. 2021MESA: Offline Meta-RL for Safe Adaptation and Fault Tolerancecited by 8
  9. 2023Risk Sensitive Dead-end Identification in Safety-Critical Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  10. 2022Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.