Safety Correction from Baseline: Towards the Risk-aware Policy in Robotics via Dual-agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning a risk-aware policy is essential but rather challenging in unstructured robotic tasks. Safe reinforcement learning methods open up new possibilities to tackle this problem. However, the conservative policy updates make it intractable to achieve sufficient exploration and desirable performance in complex, sample-expensive environments. In this paper, we propose a dual-agent safe reinforcement learning strategy consisting of a baseline and a safe agent. Such a decoupled framework enables high flexibility, data efficiency and risk-awareness for RL-based control. Concretely, the baseline agent is responsible for maximizing rewards under standard RL settings. Thus, it is compatible with off-the-shelf training techniques of unconstrained optimization, exploration and exploitation. On the other hand, the safe agent mimics the baseline agent for policy improvement and learns to fulfill safety constraints via off-policy RL tuning. In contrast to training from scratch, safe policy correction requires significantly fewer interactions to obtain a near-optimal policy. The dual policies can be optimized synchronously via a shared replay buffer, or leveraging the pre-trained model or the non-learning-based controller as a fixed baseline agent. Experimental results show that our approach can learn feasible skills without prior knowledge as well as deriving risk-averse counterparts from pre-trained unsafe policies. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art safe RL algorithms on difficult robot locomotion and manipulation tasks with respect to both safety constraint satisfaction and sample efficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2022.
Builds on
15 of 35 references.
References · 15
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 685
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
- 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
- 2017Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewardscited by 302
- 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
- 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 140
- 2018Reinforcement Learning from Imperfect Demonstrationscited by 74
- 2019Reinforcement Learning from Imperfect Demonstrations under Soft Expert Guidancecited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.