On Learning Latent Models with Multi-Instance Weak Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a weakly supervised learning scenario where the supervision signal is generated by a transition function σ of labels associated with multiple input instances. We formulate this problem as multi-instance Partial Label Learning (multi-instance PLL), which is an extension to the standard PLL problem. Our problem is met in different fields, including latent structural learning and neuro-symbolic integration. Despite the existence of many learning techniques, limited theoretical analysis has been dedicated to this problem. In this paper, we provide the first theoretical study of multi-instance PLL with possibly an unknown transition σ. Our main contributions are as follows. Firstly, we propose a necessary and sufficient condition for the learnability of the problem. This condition non-trivially generalizes and relaxes the existing small ambiguity degree in the PLL literature, since we allow the transition to be deterministic. Secondly, we derive Rademacher-style error bounds based on a top-k surrogate loss that is widely used in the neuro-symbolic literature. Furthermore, we conclude with empirical experiments for learning under unknown transitions. The empirical results align with our theoretical findings; however, they also expose the issue of scalability in the weak supervision literature.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2023.
Builds on
31 of 69 references.
References · 31
- 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 389
- 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 332
- 2017A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledgecited by 267
- 2019Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solverscited by 224
- 2017Learning Explanatory Rules from Noisy Datacited by 210
- 2019SATNet: Bridging deep learning and logical reasoning using a differentiable satisfiability solvercited by 173
- 2016Harnessing Deep Neural Networks with Logic Rulescited by 135
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
- 2019MIPaaL: Mixed Integer Program as a Layercited by 93
- 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
- 2019Generalization Bounds in the Predict-then-Optimize Frameworkcited by 54
- 2021CombOptNet: Fit the Right NP-Hard Problem by Learning Integer Programming Constraintscited by 49
19 more
- 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
- 2020Neural-Symbolic Integration: A Compositional Perspectivecited by 45
- 2020Abductive Knowledge Induction From Raw Datacited by 38
- 2021Neuro-Symbolic Inductive Logic Programming with Logical Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2019On the Consistency of Top-k Surrogate Lossescited by 35
- 2020Structured Prediction with Partial Labelling through the Infimum Losscited by 34
- 2022Unsupervised Learning for Combinatorial Optimization with Principled Objective Relaxationcited by 32
- 2020Learning from Aggregate Observationscited by 29
- 2016Structured Prediction Theory Based on Factor Graph Complexitycited by 18
- 2021Learning from Multiple Noisy Partial Labelerscited by 14
- 2018Backpropagating through Structured Argmax using a SPIGOTcited by 11
- 2020Learnability with Indirect Supervision Signalscited by 7
- 2016Estimation from Indirect Supervision with Linear Momentscited by 6
- 2020Understanding the Mechanics of SPIGOT: Surrogate Gradients for Latent Structure Learningcited by 6
- 2021Paired Examples as Indirect Supervision in Latent Decision Modelscited by 6
- 2020On the Power of Deep but Naive Partial Label Learningcited by 5
- 2023Principled and Efficient Motif Finding for Structure Learning of Lifted Graphical Modelscited by 4
- 2022Learning with Latent Structures in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 2
- 2023Probabilistic Reasoning at Scale: Trigger Graphs to the Rescuecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcutscited by 36
- 2024A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark Suite for Concept Quality and Reasoning Shortcutscited by 19
- 2024On the Independence Assumption in Neurosymbolic Learningcited by 18
- 2025Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic Lenscited by 13
- 2023Deciphering Raw Data in Neuro-Symbolic Learning with Provable Guaranteescited by 6
- 2025Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning with Margin Adjustmentcited by 4
- 2025A Learnability Analysis on Neuro-Symbolic Learningcited by 3
- 2024Imbalances in Neurosymbolic Learning: Characterization and Mitigating Strategiescited by 2
- 2025Neuro-symbolic Weak Supervision: Theory and Semanticscited by 0
- 2025Calibratable Disambiguation Loss for Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learningcited by 0
- 2026On Improving Neurosymbolic Learning by Exploiting the Representation Spacecited by 0
- 2026Constraint-Based Analysis of Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Learningcited by 0
- 2026Differentiable Logic Programming to Mitigate Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Systems23 Jul 2026
- 2026Constraint-Based Analysis of Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Learning25 Apr 2026
- 2026On Improving Neurosymbolic Learning by Exploiting the Representation Space8 Feb 2026
- 2025Calibratable Disambiguation Loss for Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning19 Dec 2025
- 2025Neuro-symbolic Weak Supervision: Theory and Semantics24 Mar 2025
- 2025A Learnability Analysis on Neuro-Symbolic Learning21 Mar 2025
- 2025Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic Lens16 Feb 2025
- 2025Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning with Margin Adjustment22 Jan 2025
- 2024Imbalances in Neurosymbolic Learning: Characterization and Mitigating Strategies13 Jul 2024
- 2024A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark Suite for Concept Quality and Reasoning Shortcuts14 Jun 2024
- 2024On the Independence Assumption in Neurosymbolic Learning12 Apr 2024
- 2024BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcuts19 Feb 2024
1 more
- 2024BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcutscited by 36
- 2024A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark Suite for Concept Quality and Reasoning Shortcutscited by 19
- 2024On the Independence Assumption in Neurosymbolic Learningcited by 18
- 2025Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic Lenscited by 13
- 2025Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning with Margin Adjustmentcited by 4
- 2025A Learnability Analysis on Neuro-Symbolic Learningcited by 3
- 2024Imbalances in Neurosymbolic Learning: Characterization and Mitigating Strategiescited by 2
- 2025Neuro-symbolic Weak Supervision: Theory and Semanticscited by 0
- 2025Calibratable Disambiguation Loss for Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learningcited by 0
- 2026On Improving Neurosymbolic Learning by Exploiting the Representation Spacecited by 0
- 2026Constraint-Based Analysis of Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Learningcited by 0
- 2026Constraint-Based Analysis of Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Learning25 Apr 2026
- 2026On Improving Neurosymbolic Learning by Exploiting the Representation Space8 Feb 2026
- 2025Calibratable Disambiguation Loss for Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning19 Dec 2025
- 2025Neuro-symbolic Weak Supervision: Theory and Semantics24 Mar 2025
- 2025A Learnability Analysis on Neuro-Symbolic Learning21 Mar 2025
- 2025Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic Lens16 Feb 2025
- 2025Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning with Margin Adjustment22 Jan 2025
- 2024Imbalances in Neurosymbolic Learning: Characterization and Mitigating Strategies13 Jul 2024
- 2024A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark Suite for Concept Quality and Reasoning Shortcuts14 Jun 2024
- 2024On the Independence Assumption in Neurosymbolic Learning12 Apr 2024
- 2024BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcuts19 Feb 2024