mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Learning Latent Models with Multi-Instance Weak Supervision

arXiv 2306.13796 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a weakly supervised learning scenario where the supervision signal is generated by a transition function σ of labels associated with multiple input instances. We formulate this problem as multi-instance Partial Label Learning (multi-instance PLL), which is an extension to the standard PLL problem. Our problem is met in different fields, including latent structural learning and neuro-symbolic integration. Despite the existence of many learning techniques, limited theoretical analysis has been dedicated to this problem. In this paper, we provide the first theoretical study of multi-instance PLL with possibly an unknown transition σ. Our main contributions are as follows. Firstly, we propose a necessary and sufficient condition for the learnability of the problem. This condition non-trivially generalizes and relaxes the existing small ambiguity degree in the PLL literature, since we allow the transition to be deterministic. Secondly, we derive Rademacher-style error bounds based on a top-k surrogate loss that is widely used in the neuro-symbolic literature. Furthermore, we conclude with empirical experiments for learning under unknown transitions. The empirical results align with our theoretical findings; however, they also expose the issue of scalability in the weak supervision literature.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2023.

Builds on

31 of 69 references.

References · 31

  1. 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 389
  2. 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 332
  3. 2017A Semantic Loss Function for Deep Learning with Symbolic Knowledgecited by 267
  4. 2019Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solverscited by 224
  5. 2017Learning Explanatory Rules from Noisy Datacited by 210
  6. 2019SATNet: Bridging deep learning and logical reasoning using a differentiable satisfiability solvercited by 173
  7. 2016Harnessing Deep Neural Networks with Logic Rulescited by 135
  8. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  9. 2019MIPaaL: Mixed Integer Program as a Layercited by 93
  10. 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
  11. 2019Generalization Bounds in the Predict-then-Optimize Frameworkcited by 54
  12. 2021CombOptNet: Fit the Right NP-Hard Problem by Learning Integer Programming Constraintscited by 49
19 more
  1. 2021Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 49
  2. 2020Neural-Symbolic Integration: A Compositional Perspectivecited by 45
  3. 2020Abductive Knowledge Induction From Raw Datacited by 38
  4. 2021Neuro-Symbolic Inductive Logic Programming with Logical Neural Networkscited by 36
  5. 2019On the Consistency of Top-k Surrogate Lossescited by 35
  6. 2020Structured Prediction with Partial Labelling through the Infimum Losscited by 34
  7. 2022Unsupervised Learning for Combinatorial Optimization with Principled Objective Relaxationcited by 32
  8. 2020Learning from Aggregate Observationscited by 29
  9. 2016Structured Prediction Theory Based on Factor Graph Complexitycited by 18
  10. 2021Learning from Multiple Noisy Partial Labelerscited by 14
  11. 2018Backpropagating through Structured Argmax using a SPIGOTcited by 11
  12. 2020Learnability with Indirect Supervision Signalscited by 7
  13. 2016Estimation from Indirect Supervision with Linear Momentscited by 6
  14. 2020Understanding the Mechanics of SPIGOT: Surrogate Gradients for Latent Structure Learningcited by 6
  15. 2021Paired Examples as Indirect Supervision in Latent Decision Modelscited by 6
  16. 2020On the Power of Deep but Naive Partial Label Learningcited by 5
  17. 2023Principled and Efficient Motif Finding for Structure Learning of Lifted Graphical Modelscited by 4
  18. 2022Learning with Latent Structures in Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 2
  19. 2023Probabilistic Reasoning at Scale: Trigger Graphs to the Rescuecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: