mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Image Classifier Training for Improved Certified Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches

arXiv 2306.12610 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2023cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Certifiably robust defenses against adversarial patches for image classifiers ensure correct prediction against any changes to a constrained neighborhood of pixels. PatchCleanser arXiv:2108.09135 [cs.CV], the state-of-the-art certified defense, uses a double-masking strategy for robust classification. The success of this strategy relies heavily on the model's invariance to image pixel masking. In this paper, we take a closer look at model training schemes to improve this invariance. Instead of using Random Cutout arXiv:1708.04552v2 [cs.CV] augmentations like PatchCleanser, we introduce the notion of worst-case masking, i.e., selecting masked images which maximize classification loss. However, finding worst-case masks requires an exhaustive search, which might be prohibitively expensive to do on-the-fly during training. To solve this problem, we propose a two-round greedy masking strategy (Greedy Cutout) which finds an approximate worst-case mask location with much less compute. We show that the models trained with our Greedy Cutout improves certified robust accuracy over Random Cutout in PatchCleanser across a range of datasets and architectures. Certified robust accuracy on ImageNet with a ViT-B16-224 model increases from 58.1% to 62.3% against a 3% square patch applied anywhere on the image.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2023.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  6. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  7. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  8. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
  9. 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 368
  10. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 234
  11. 2016Grad-CAM: Why did you say that?cited by 161
  12. 2020Certified Defenses for Adversarial Patchescited by 101
10 more
  1. 2020(De)Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable Defense against Patch Attackscited by 98
  2. 2019Defending Against Physically Realizable Attacks on Image Classificationcited by 66
  3. 2021Improved OOD Generalization via Adversarial Training and Pre-trainingcited by 66
  4. 2021PatchCleanser: Certifiably Robust Defense against Adversarial Patches for Any Image Classifiercited by 65
  5. 2020Adversarial Training against Location-Optimized Adversarial Patchescited by 50
  6. 2021Certified Patch Robustness via Smoothed Vision Transformerscited by 45
  7. 2023Data Augmentation Alone Can Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  8. 2021Efficient Certified Defenses Against Patch Attacks on Image Classifierscited by 24
  9. 2022Enhance the Visual Representation via Discrete Adversarial Trainingcited by 23
  10. 2022Fast Adversarial Training with Noise Augmentation: A Unified Perspective on RandStart and GradAligncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.