mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Challenges and Opportunities in Improving Worst-Group Generalization in Presence of Spurious Features

arXiv 2306.11957 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks often exploit *spurious* features that are present in the majority of examples within a class during training. This leads to *poor worst-group test accuracy*, i.e., poor accuracy for minority groups that lack these spurious features. Despite the growing body of recent efforts to address spurious correlations (SC), several challenging settings remain unexplored.In this work, we propose studying methods to mitigate SC in settings with: 1) spurious features that are learned more slowly, 2) a larger number of classes, and 3) a larger number of groups. We introduce two new datasets, Animals and SUN, to facilitate this study and conduct a systematic benchmarking of 8 state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods across a total of 5 vision datasets, training over 5,000 models. Through this, we highlight how existing group inference methods struggle in the presence of spurious features that are learned later in training. Additionally, we demonstrate how all existing methods struggle in settings with more groups and/or classes. Finally, we show the importance of careful model selection (hyperparameter tuning) in extracting optimal performance, especially in the more challenging settings we introduced, and propose more cost-efficient strategies for model selection. Overall, through extensive and systematic experiments, this work uncovers a suite of new challenges and opportunities for improving worst-group generalization in the presence of spurious features. Our datasets, methods and scripts available at https://github.com/BigML-CS-UCLA/SpuCo.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

Builds on

24 of 33 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,777
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,686
  5. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,847
  6. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,405
  7. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,371
  8. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,048
  9. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  10. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  11. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 380
  12. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
12 more
  1. 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
  2. 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 120
  3. 2022Spread Spurious Attribute: Improving Worst-group Accuracy with Spurious Attribute Estimationcited by 88
  4. 2022NICO++: Towards Better Benchmarking for Domain Generalizationcited by 86
  5. 2022A Whac-A-Mole Dilemma: Shortcuts Come in Multiples Where Mitigating One Amplifies Otherscited by 85
  6. 2021BiaSwap: Removing dataset bias with bias-tailored swapping augmentationcited by 70
  7. 2023Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Multi-modal Models during Fine-tuningcited by 47
  8. 2022ImageNet-X: Understanding Model Mistakes with Factor of Variation Annotationscited by 44
  9. 2023Identifying Spurious Biases Early in Training through the Lens of Simplicity Biascited by 44
  10. 2023Robust Learning with Progressive Data Expansion Against Spurious Correlationcited by 39
  11. 2021Understanding and Mitigating Accuracy Disparity in Regressioncited by 17
  12. 2021Identifying and Benchmarking Natural Out-of-Context Prediction Problemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.