Cumulative Meta-Learning from Active Learning Queries for Robustness to Spurious Correlations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spurious correlations in real-world datasets cause machine learning models to rely on irrelevant patterns, undermining reliability, generalization, and fairness. Active learning offers a promising way to address this failure mode by querying informative samples that distinguish core features from spurious ones. However, standard active-learning methods simply append queried examples to the labeled set, effectively updating only the likelihood term. In deep learning regimes, the influence of these informative samples can be diluted by the larger labeled set and memorized by overparameterized models. We propose Cumulative Active Meta-Learning (CAML), an active-learning framework that uses queried examples to meta-learn the prior, or inductive bias, governing how the model adapts. CAML casts each active-learning round as a meta-learning task: the current labeled set serves as meta-train data for adaptation, while the newly queried batch serves as meta-test data for evaluating generalization. Unlike conventional meta-learning, which treats tasks as independent and identically distributed, CAML exploits the sequential dependence between active-learning rounds by maintaining a cumulative inductive bias that is progressively refined. Theoretically, we show that this cumulative formulation introduces interaction terms that couple earlier meta-learned inductive biases with later query-induced objectives, capturing dependencies absent from standard meta-learning. Empirically, CAML improves minority-group accuracy across spurious-correlation benchmarks and acquisition strategies, with gains of up to 27.8% on Dominoes, 29.9% on Waterbirds, 14.3% on SpuCo, and 24.0% on CivilComments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
55 of 73 references.
References · 55
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,782
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 762
38 more
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 616
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2016RL2: Fast Reinforcement Learning via Slow Reinforcement Learningcited by 490
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 488
- 2018Meta-Learning with Latent Embedding Optimizationcited by 476
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 377
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
- 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
- 2018Probabilistic Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 254
- 2018Bayesian Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 194
- 2020Invariant Risk Minimization Gamescited by 188
- 2018Recasting Gradient-Based Meta-Learning as Hierarchical Bayescited by 180
- 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 177
- 2022Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 171
- 2018Adversarial Active Learning for Deep Networks: a Margin Based Approachcited by 155
- 2020AutoML-Zero: Evolving Machine Learning Algorithms From Scratchcited by 137
- 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
- 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 119
- 2020Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biasescited by 116
- 2019Discriminative Active Learningcited by 97
- 2019Deep Active Learning: Unified and Principled Method for Query and Trainingcited by 92
- 2017Deep Active Learning over the Long Tailcited by 82
- 2022Agree to Disagree: Diversity through Disagreement for Better Transferabilitycited by 69
- 2022MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explorecited by 66
- 2016Coresets and Sketchescited by 63
- 2018Learning to Teach with Dynamic Loss Functionscited by 40
- 2022Active Learning Helps Pretrained Models Learn the Intended Taskcited by 33
- 2018Meta-Learning Transferable Active Learning Policies by Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 26
- 2020Sequential Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 25
- 2025Uncovering Memorization Effect in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 20
- 2024The Pitfalls of Memorization: When Memorization Hurts Generalizationcited by 16
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.