Vacant Holes for Unsupervised Detection of the Outliers in Compact Latent Representation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Detection of the outliers is pivotal for any machine learning model deployed and operated in real-world. It is essential for the Deep Neural Networks that were shown to be overconfident with such inputs. Moreover, even deep generative models that allow estimation of the probability density of the input fail in achieving this task. In this work, we concentrate on the specific type of these models: Variational Autoencoders (VAEs). First, we unveil a significant theoretical flaw in the assumption of the classical VAE model. Second, we enforce an accommodating topological property to the image of the deep neural mapping to the latent space: compactness to alleviate the flaw and obtain the means to provably bound the image within the determined limits by squeezing both inliers and outliers together. We enforce compactness using two approaches: (i) Alexandroff extension and (ii) fixed Lipschitz continuity constant on the mapping of the encoder of the VAEs. Finally and most importantly, we discover that the anomalous inputs predominantly tend to land on the vacant latent holes within the compact space, enabling their successful identification. For that reason, we introduce a specifically devised score for hole detection and evaluate the solution against several baseline benchmarks achieving promising results.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2023.
Builds on
24 of 44 references.
References · 24
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 859
- 2019Likelihood Ratios for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 451
- 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
- 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 288
- 2020Why Normalizing Flows Fail to Detect Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 220
- 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
- 2018Lipschitz-Margin Training: Scalable Certification of Perturbation Invariance for Deep Neural Networkscited by 193
- 2018Hyperspherical Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 188
12 more
- 2019Input complexity and out-of-distribution detection with likelihood-based generative modelscited by 186
- 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 182
- 2017Spectral Norm Regularization for Improving the Generalizability of Deep Learningcited by 178
- 2020Likelihood Regret: An Out-of-Distribution Detection Score For Variational Auto-encodercited by 145
- 2018Explorations in Homeomorphic Variational Auto-Encodingcited by 65
- 2020Understanding Anomaly Detection with Deep Invertible Networks through Hierarchies of Distributions and Featurescited by 64
- 2018Limitations of the Lipschitz constant as a defense against adversarial examplescited by 48
- 2020Perfect density models cannot guarantee anomaly detectioncited by 39
- 2019Bayesian Variational Autoencoders for Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 35
- 2021Certifiably Robust Variational Autoencoderscited by 14
- 2021On the Latent Holes of VAEs for Text Generationcited by 4
- 2022Do Bayesian Variational Autoencoders Know What They Don't Know?cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.