mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Voting Booklet Bias: Stance Detection in Swiss Federal Communication

arXiv 2306.08999 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we use recent stance detection methods to study the stance (for, against or neutral) of statements in official information booklets for voters. Our main goal is to answer the fundamental question: are topics to be voted on presented in a neutral way? To this end, we first train and compare several models for stance detection on a large dataset about Swiss politics. We find that fine-tuning an M-BERT model leads to the best accuracy. We then use our best model to analyze the stance of utterances extracted from the Swiss federal voting booklet concerning the Swiss popular votes of September 2022, which is the main goal of this project. We evaluated the models in both a multilingual as well as a monolingual context for German, French, and Italian. Our analysis shows that some issues are heavily favored while others are more balanced, and that the results are largely consistent across languages. Our findings have implications for the editorial process of future voting booklets and the design of better automated systems for analyzing political discourse. The data and code accompanying this paper are available at https://github.com/ZurichNLP/voting-booklet-bias.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.

Builds on

7 of 25 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  3. 2021A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation Identificationcited by 75
  4. 2020X-Stance: A Multilingual Multi-Target Dataset for Stance Detectioncited by 43
  5. 2020Analyzing Political Bias and Unfairness in News Articles at Different Levels of Granularitycited by 32
  6. 2022Legal and Political Stance Detection of SCOTUS Languagecited by 5
  7. 2020Deep Learning for Political Sciencecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.