mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Amplification of Linguistic Bias through Unintentional Self-reinforcement Learning by Generative Language Models -- A Perspective

arXiv 2306.07135 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative Language Models (GLMs) have the potential to significantly shape our linguistic landscape due to their expansive use in various digital applications. However, this widespread adoption might inadvertently trigger a self-reinforcement learning cycle that can amplify existing linguistic biases. This paper explores the possibility of such a phenomenon, where the initial biases in GLMs, reflected in their generated text, can feed into the learning material of subsequent models, thereby reinforcing and amplifying these biases. Moreover, the paper highlights how the pervasive nature of GLMs might influence the linguistic and cognitive development of future generations, as they may unconsciously learn and reproduce these biases. The implications of this potential self-reinforcement cycle extend beyond the models themselves, impacting human language and discourse. The advantages and disadvantages of this bias amplification are weighed, considering educational benefits and ease of future GLM learning against threats to linguistic diversity and dependence on initial GLMs. This paper underscores the need for rigorous research to understand and address these issues. It advocates for improved model transparency, bias-aware training techniques, development of methods to distinguish between human and GLM-generated text, and robust measures for fairness and bias evaluation in GLMs. The aim is to ensure the effective, safe, and equitable use of these powerful technologies, while preserving the richness and diversity of human language.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  5. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
  6. 2019On the Efficacy of Knowledge Distillationcited by 381
  7. 2022Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Modelscited by 220

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.