mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Sparse Can We Prune A Deep Network: A Fundamental Limit Perspective

arXiv 2306.05857 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Network pruning is a commonly used measure to alleviate the storage and computational burden of deep neural networks. However, the fundamental limit of network pruning is still lacking. To close the gap, in this work we'll take a first-principles approach, i.e. we'll directly impose the sparsity constraint on the loss function and leverage the framework of statistical dimension in convex geometry, thus enabling us to characterize the sharp phase transition point, which can be regarded as the fundamental limit of the pruning ratio. Through this limit, we're able to identify two key factors that determine the pruning ratio limit, namely, weight magnitude and network sharpness. Generally speaking, the flatter the loss landscape or the smaller the weight magnitude, the smaller pruning ratio. Moreover, we provide efficient countermeasures to address the challenges in the computation of the pruning limit, which mainly involves the accurate spectrum estimation of a large-scale and non-positive Hessian matrix. Moreover, through the lens of the pruning ratio threshold, we can also provide rigorous interpretations on several heuristics in existing pruning algorithms. Extensive experiments are performed which demonstrate that our theoretical pruning ratio threshold coincides very well with the experiments. All codes are available at: https://github.com/QiaozheZhang/Global-One-shot-Pruning

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.

Builds on

23 of 47 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
  4. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  5. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  6. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
  7. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 637
  8. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
  9. 2018Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Accelerationcited by 367
  10. 2017SkipNet: Learning Dynamic Routing in Convolutional Networkscited by 332
  11. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 292
  12. 2016Dynamic Network Surgery for Efficient DNNscited by 233
11 more
  1. 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 182
  2. 2018NetAdapt: Platform-Aware Neural Network Adaptation for Mobile Applicationscited by 147
  3. 2016Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruningcited by 134
  4. 2020Relative Flatness and Generalizationcited by 88
  5. 2020Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the Jackpotcited by 66
  6. 2022The Combinatorial Brain Surgeon: Pruning Weights That Cancel One Another in Neural Networkscited by 41
  7. 2023Fast as CHITA: Neural Network Pruning with Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 40
  8. 2022Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?cited by 38
  9. 2022Rare Gems: Finding Lottery Tickets at Initializationcited by 34
  10. 2021How many degrees of freedom do we need to train deep networks: a loss landscape perspectivecited by 28
  11. 2022spred: Solving L1 Penalty with SGDcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 4.

9 papers.