Pruning-induced phases in fully-connected neural networks: the eumentia, the dementia, and the amentia
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern neural networks are heavily overparameterized, and pruning, which removes redundant neurons or connections, has emerged as a key approach to compressing them without sacrificing performance. However, while practical pruning methods are well developed, whether pruning induces sharp phase transitions in the neural networks and, if so, to what universality class they belong, remain open questions. To address this, we study fully-connected neural networks trained on MNIST, independently varying the dropout (i.e., removing neurons) rate at both the training and evaluation stages to map the phase diagram. We identify three distinct phases: eumentia (the network learns), dementia (the network has forgotten), and amentia (the network cannot learn), sharply distinguished by the power-law scaling of the cross-entropy loss with the training dataset size. {In the eumentia phase, the algebraic decay of the loss, as documented in the machine learning literature as neural scaling laws, is from the perspective of statistical mechanics the hallmark of quasi-long-range order.} We demonstrate that the transition between the eumentia and dementia phases is accompanied by scale invariance, with a diverging length scale that exhibits hallmarks of a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless-like transition; the phase structure is robust across different network widths and depths. Our results establish that dropout-induced pruning provides a concrete setting in which neural network behavior can be understood through the lens of statistical mechanics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
21 of 42 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
- 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
9 more
- 2016Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 538
- 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 521
- 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
- 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 369
- 2024The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of the Deeper Layerscited by 219
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
- 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
- 2023How Sparse Can We Prune A Deep Network: A Fundamental Limit Perspectivecited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.