mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Approaches for Context-Aware Human Activity Recognition

arXiv 2306.05058 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AI eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Learning models are a standard solution for sensor-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR), but their deployment is often limited by labeled data scarcity and models' opacity. Neuro-Symbolic AI (NeSy) provides an interesting research direction to mitigate these issues by infusing knowledge about context information into HAR deep learning classifiers. However, existing NeSy methods for context-aware HAR require computationally expensive symbolic reasoners during classification, making them less suitable for deployment on resource-constrained devices (e.g., mobile devices). Additionally, NeSy approaches for context-aware HAR have never been evaluated on in-the-wild datasets, and their generalization capabilities in real-world scenarios are questionable. In this work, we propose a novel approach based on a semantic loss function that infuses knowledge constraints in the HAR model during the training phase, avoiding symbolic reasoning during classification. Our results on scripted and in-the-wild datasets show the impact of different semantic loss functions in outperforming a purely data-driven model. We also compare our solution with existing NeSy methods and analyze each approach's strengths and weaknesses. Our semantic loss remains the only NeSy solution that can be deployed as a single DNN without the need for symbolic reasoning modules, reaching recognition rates close (and better in some cases) to existing approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2023.

Builds on

9 of 36 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
  2. 2017Deep Learning for Sensor-based Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 133
  3. 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 126
  4. 2021Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyondcited by 118
  5. 2021Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Current Trendscited by 54
  6. 2016Recognizing Detailed Human Context In-the-Wild from Smartphones and Smartwatchescited by 42
  7. 2019Cross-Subject Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition Systems using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 35
  8. 2020Semantics of the Black-Box: Can knowledge graphs help make deep learning systems more interpretable and explainable?cited by 31
  9. 2019Context-driven Active and Incremental Activity Recognitioncited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: A Task-Directed Survey in the Black-Box Models Era
  2. 2025Towards Generalizable Human Activity Recognition: A Survey
  3. 2025Symbol Grounding in Neuro-Symbolic AI: A Gentle Introduction to Reasoning Shortcuts
  4. 2026Knowledge Distillation for LLM-Based Human Activity Recognition in Homes
  5. 2024The Role of Foundation Models in Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning
  6. 2022Is Neuro-Symbolic AI Meeting its Promise in Natural Language Processing? A Structured Review
  7. 2022Ultra-compact Binary Neural Networks for Human Activity Recognition on RISC-V Processors
  8. 2024Parameter Choice and Neuro-Symbolic Approaches for Deep Domain-Invariant Learning