mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are Training Resources Insufficient? Predict First Then Explain!

arXiv 2110.02056 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural language free-text explanation generation is an efficient approach to train explainable language processing models for commonsense-knowledge-requiring tasks. The most predominant form of these models is the explain-then-predict (EtP) structure, which first generates explanations and uses them for making decisions. The performance of EtP models is highly dependent on that of the explainer by the nature of their structure. Therefore, large-sized explanation data are required to train a good explainer model. However, annotating explanations is expensive. Also, recent works reveal that free-text explanations might not convey sufficient information for decision making. These facts cast doubts on the effectiveness of EtP models. In this paper, we argue that the predict-then-explain (PtE) architecture is a more efficient approach in terms of the modelling perspective. Our main contribution is twofold. First, we show that the PtE structure is the most data-efficient approach when explanation data are lacking. Second, we reveal that the PtE structure is always more training-efficient than the EtP structure. We also provide experimental results that confirm the theoretical advantages.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2021.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  4. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  5. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  6. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  7. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  8. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  9. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  10. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  11. 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 159
  12. 2020WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictionscited by 148
13 more
  1. 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
  2. 2019Generalization in Generation: A closer look at Exposure Biascited by 123
  3. 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
  4. 2019Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Controlcited by 96
  5. 2020NILE : Natural Language Inference with Faithful Natural Language Explanationscited by 96
  6. 2019Make Up Your Mind! Adversarial Generation of Inconsistent Natural Language Explanationscited by 71
  7. 2020An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extractioncited by 69
  8. 2020Conditionally Adaptive Multi-Task Learning: Improving Transfer Learning in NLP Using Fewer Parameters & Less Datacited by 50
  9. 2020Explaining Question Answering Models through Text Generationcited by 33
  10. 2020LIREx: Augmenting Language Inference with Relevant Explanationcited by 24
  11. 2020Weakly- and Semi-supervised Evidence Extractioncited by 16
  12. 2019Predicting Annotation Difficulty to Improve Task Routing and Model Performance for Biomedical Information Extractioncited by 9
  13. 2021You Can Do Better! If You Elaborate the Reason When Making Predictioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.