mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tackling Non-Stationarity in Reinforcement Learning via Causal-Origin Representation

arXiv 2306.02747 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In real-world scenarios, the application of reinforcement learning is significantly challenged by complex non-stationarity. Most existing methods attempt to model changes in the environment explicitly, often requiring impractical prior knowledge of environments. In this paper, we propose a new perspective, positing that non-stationarity can propagate and accumulate through complex causal relationships during state transitions, thereby compounding its sophistication and affecting policy learning. We believe that this challenge can be more effectively addressed by implicitly tracing the causal origin of non-stationarity. To this end, we introduce the Causal-Origin REPresentation (COREP) algorithm. COREP primarily employs a guided updating mechanism to learn a stable graph representation for the state, termed as causal-origin representation. By leveraging this representation, the learned policy exhibits impressive resilience to non-stationarity. We supplement our approach with a theoretical analysis grounded in the causal interpretation for non-stationary reinforcement learning, advocating for the validity of the causal-origin representation. Experimental results further demonstrate the superior performance of COREP over existing methods in tackling non-stationarity problems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.

Builds on

26 of 59 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  5. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  6. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  7. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
  8. 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 329
  9. 2018Learning to Adapt in Dynamic, Real-World Environments Through Meta-Reinforcement Learningcited by 270
  10. 2019VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learningcited by 210
  11. 2021D'ya like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discoverycited by 209
  12. 2019Causal Discovery from Heterogeneous/Nonstationary Data with Independent Changescited by 166
14 more
  1. 2013Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Biascited by 165
  2. 2017Continuous Adaptation via Meta-Learning in Nonstationary and Competitive Environmentscited by 106
  3. 2020A Survey of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Dynamically Varying Environmentscited by 62
  4. 2021AdaRL: What, Where, and How to Adapt in Transfer Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
  5. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning amidst Lifelong Non-Stationaritycited by 42
  6. 2020Optimizing for the Future in Non-Stationary MDPscited by 37
  7. 2020Domain Adaptation as a Problem of Inference on Graphical Modelscited by 36
  8. 2022Factored Adaptation for Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  9. 2021Block Contextual MDPs for Continual Learningcited by 25
  10. 2020Causal Structure Discovery from Distributions Arising from Mixtures of DAGscited by 24
  11. 2021Minimum-Delay Adaptation in Non-Stationary Reinforcement Learning via Online High-Confidence Change-Point Detectioncited by 18
  12. 2021Invariant Policy Learning: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
  13. 2021Meta-Reinforcement Learning by Tracking Task Non-stationaritycited by 8
  14. 2019Causal Discovery with a Mixture of DAGscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.