Towards a Better Understanding of Representation Dynamics under TD-learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
TD-learning is a foundation reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for value prediction. Critical to the accuracy of value predictions is the quality of state representations. In this work, we consider the question: how does end-to-end TD-learning impact the representation over time? Complementary to prior work, we provide a set of analysis that sheds further light on the representation dynamics under TD-learning. We first show that when the environments are reversible, end-to-end TD-learning strictly decreases the value approximation error over time. Under further assumptions on the environments, we can connect the representation dynamics with spectral decomposition over the transition matrix. This latter finding establishes fitting multiple value functions from randomly generated rewards as a useful auxiliary task for representation learning, as we empirically validate on both tabular and Atari game suites.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2023.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,099
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
- 2016Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Taskscited by 404
- 2020Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive Representationscited by 318
- 2015An Emphatic Approach to the Problem of Off-policy Temporal-Difference Learningcited by 103
- 2020Bootstrap Latent-Predictive Representations for Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 102
- 2017Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representationcited by 86
- 2019Hyperbolic Discounting and Learning over Multiple Horizonscited by 60
- 2020The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
- 2021On The Effect of Auxiliary Tasks on Representation Dynamicscited by 57
13 more
- 2019A Geometric Perspective on Optimal Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
- 2019SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Pythoncited by 49
- 2019A Comparative Analysis of Expected and Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
- 2022Understanding Self-Predictive Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2022Spectral Decomposition Representation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
- 2019Neural Temporal-Difference and Q-Learning Provably Converge to Global Optimacited by 20
- 2017Shallow Updates for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
- 2019Geometric Insights into the Convergence of Nonlinear TD Learningcited by 13
- 2018Approximate Temporal Difference Learning is a Gradient Descent for Reversible Policiescited by 10
- 2019Asymptotics of Reinforcement Learning with Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2020Can Temporal-Difference and Q-Learning Learn Representation? A Mean-Field Theorycited by 8
- 2021Learning State Representations from Random Deep Action-conditional Predictionscited by 6
- 2019Temporal-difference learning with nonlinear function approximation: lazy training and mean field regimescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.