mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FERMAT: An Alternative to Accuracy for Numerical Reasoning

arXiv 2305.17491 ↗First posted 27 May 2023cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

While pre-trained language models achieve impressive performance on various NLP benchmarks, they still struggle with tasks that require numerical reasoning. Recent advances in improving numerical reasoning are mostly achieved using very large language models that contain billions of parameters and are not accessible to everyone. In addition, numerical reasoning is measured using a single score on existing datasets. As a result, we do not have a clear understanding of the strengths and shortcomings of existing models on different numerical reasoning aspects and therefore, potential ways to improve them apart from scaling them up. Inspired by CheckList (Ribeiro et al., 2020), we introduce a multi-view evaluation set for numerical reasoning in English, called FERMAT. Instead of reporting a single score on a whole dataset, FERMAT evaluates models on various key numerical reasoning aspects such as number understanding, mathematical operations, and training dependency. Apart from providing a comprehensive evaluation of models on different numerical reasoning aspects, FERMAT enables a systematic and automated generation of an arbitrarily large training or evaluation set for each aspect.The datasets and codes are publicly available to generate further multi-view data for ulterior tasks and languages.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 33 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.

Builds on

33 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Teaching Algorithmic Reasoning via In-context Learning15 Nov
  2. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models29 Jun
  3. 2022NumGLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Mathematical Reasoning Tasks12 Apr

Other references · 30

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  6. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  7. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  8. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  9. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  10. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  11. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
  12. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
18 more
  1. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  2. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
  3. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
  4. 2016Solving General Arithmetic Word Problemscited by 353
  5. 2019Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Modelscited by 331
  6. 2020Answering Complex Open-Domain Questions with Multi-Hop Dense Retrievalcited by 160
  7. 2020Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Modelscited by 133
  8. 2019"Going on a vacation" takes longer than "Going for a walk": A Study of Temporal Commonsense Understandingcited by 121
  9. 2019Quoref: A Reading Comprehension Dataset with Questions Requiring Coreferential Reasoningcited by 100
  10. 2018Transforming Question Answering Datasets Into Natural Language Inference Datasetscited by 99
  11. 2020INFOTABS: Inference on Tables as Semi-structured Datacited by 84
  12. 2019Giving BERT a Calculator: Finding Operations and Arguments with Reading Comprehensioncited by 51
  13. 2018QuaRel: A Dataset and Models for Answering Questions about Qualitative Relationshipscited by 46
  14. 2021MWP-BERT: Numeracy-Augmented Pre-training for Math Word Problem Solvingcited by 32
  15. 2021Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Math Word Problem Solverscited by 20
  16. 2023Evaluating Transformer Language Models on Arithmetic Operations Using Number Decompositioncited by 15
  17. 2021NT5?! Training T5 to Perform Numerical Reasoningcited by 11
  18. 2022Practice Makes a Solver Perfect: Data Augmentation for Math Word Problem Solverscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Exposing Numeracy Gaps: A Benchmark to Evaluate Fundamental Numerical Abilities in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges
  3. 2022Reflection of Thought: Inversely Eliciting Numerical Reasoning in Language Models via Solving Linear Systems
  4. 2025Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models
  5. 2024Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correction
  6. 2023Exploring the Numerical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models: A Comprehensive Analysis on Tabular Data
  7. 2023ARB: Advanced Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models
  8. 2026PluraMath: Extending Mathematical Reasoning Evaluation Beyond High-Resource Languages