mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning from Integral Losses in Physics Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2305.17387 ↗First posted 27 May 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.NAcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work proposes a solution for the problem of training physics-informed networks under partial integro-differential equations. These equations require an infinite or a large number of neural evaluations to construct a single residual for training. As a result, accurate evaluation may be impractical, and we show that naive approximations at replacing these integrals with unbiased estimates lead to biased loss functions and solutions. To overcome this bias, we investigate three types of potential solutions: the deterministic sampling approaches, the double-sampling trick, and the delayed target method. We consider three classes of PDEs for benchmarking; one defining Poisson problems with singular charges and weak solutions of up to 10 dimensions, another involving weak solutions on electro-magnetic fields and a Maxwell equation, and a third one defining a Smoluchowski coagulation problem. Our numerical results confirm the existence of the aforementioned bias in practice and also show that our proposed delayed target approach can lead to accurate solutions with comparable quality to ones estimated with a large sample size integral. Our implementation is open-source and available at https://github.com/ehsansaleh/btspinn.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 83 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
  4. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
  5. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
  6. 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 374
  7. 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 256
  8. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
  9. 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 156
  10. 2019Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks For Solving Partial Differential Equationscited by 148
  11. 2021Parallel Physics-Informed Neural Networks via Domain Decompositioncited by 112
  12. 2020Physics-Informed Neural Network for Modelling the Thermochemical Curing Process of Composite-Tool Systems During Manufacturecited by 48
7 more
  1. 2021Physics informed neural networks for continuum micromechanicscited by 46
  2. 2019D3M: A deep domain decomposition method for partial differential equationscited by 44
  3. 2020Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: Predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networkscited by 42
  4. 2022Why Should I Trust You, Bellman? The Bellman Error is a Poor Replacement for Value Errorcited by 32
  5. 2021On Instrumental Variable Regression for Deep Offline Policy Evaluationcited by 22
  6. 2021On the Importance of Firth Bias Reduction in Few-Shot Classificationcited by 7
  7. 2022An Experimental Comparison Between Temporal Difference and Residual Gradient with Neural Network Approximationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

4 papers.