mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Controlling Learned Effects to Reduce Spurious Correlations in Text Classifiers

arXiv 2305.16863 ↗First posted 26 May 2023cs.LG cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To address the problem of NLP classifiers learning spurious correlations between training features and target labels, a common approach is to make the model's predictions invariant to these features. However, this can be counter-productive when the features have a non-zero causal effect on the target label and thus are important for prediction. Therefore, using methods from the causal inference literature, we propose an algorithm to regularize the learnt effect of the features on the model's prediction to the estimated effect of feature on label. This results in an automated augmentation method that leverages the estimated effect of a feature to appropriately change the labels for new augmented inputs. On toxicity and IMDB review datasets, the proposed algorithm minimises spurious correlations and improves the minority group (i.e., samples breaking spurious correlations) accuracy, while also improving the total accuracy compared to standard training.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2023.

Builds on

26 of 43 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  2. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  3. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  4. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
  5. 2020Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projectioncited by 455
  6. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
  7. 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
  8. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  9. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
  10. 2019Mitigating Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing: Literature Reviewcited by 287
  11. 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 264
  12. 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 222
14 more
  1. 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 211
  2. 2019End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corporacited by 128
  3. 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 101
  4. 2022Shortcut Learning of Large Language Models in Natural Language Understandingcited by 85
  5. 2021Identifying and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Improving Robustness in NLP Modelscited by 76
  6. 2022Diversify and Disambiguate: Learning From Underspecified Datacited by 56
  7. 2021RieszNet and ForestRiesz: Automatic Debiased Machine Learning with Neural Nets and Random Forestscited by 42
  8. 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 41
  9. 2022Mitigating Gender Bias in Distilled Language Models via Counterfactual Role Reversalcited by 40
  10. 2021Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifactscited by 38
  11. 2022Are All Spurious Features in Natural Language Alike? An Analysis through a Causal Lenscited by 28
  12. 2022NeuroCounterfactuals: Beyond Minimal-Edit Counterfactuals for Richer Data Augmentationcited by 23
  13. 2022Controlling Bias Exposure for Fair Interpretable Predictionscited by 18
  14. 2022Causal Estimation for Text Data with (Apparent) Overlap Violationscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.