A Matrix Chernoff Bound for Strongly Rayleigh Distributions and Spectral Sparsifiers from a few Random Spanning Trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Strongly Rayleigh distributions are a class of negatively dependent distributions of binary-valued random variables [Borcea, Branden, Liggett JAMS 09]. Recently, these distributions have played a crucial role in the analysis of algorithms for fundamental graph problems, e.g. Traveling Salesman Problem [Gharan, Saberi, Singh FOCS 11]. We prove a new matrix Chernoff bound for Strongly Rayleigh distributions. As an immediate application, we show that adding together the Laplacians of ε-2 log2 n random spanning trees gives an (1± ε) spectral sparsifiers of graph Laplacians with high probability. Thus, we positively answer an open question posed in [Baston, Spielman, Srivastava, Teng JACM 13]. Our number of spanning trees for spectral sparsifier matches the number of spanning trees required to obtain a cut sparsifier in [Fung, Hariharan, Harvey, Panigraphi STOC 11]. The previous best result was by naively applying a classical matrix Chernoff bound which requires ε-2 n log n spanning trees. For the tree averaging procedure to agree with the original graph Laplacian in expectation, each edge of the tree should be reweighted by the inverse of the edge leverage score in the original graph. We also show that when using this reweighting of the edges, the Laplacian of single random tree is bounded above in the PSD order by the original graph Laplacian times a factor log n with high probability, i.e. LT preceq O(log n) LG. We show a lower bound that almost matches our last result, namely that in some graphs, with high probability, the random spanning tree is itnot bounded above in the spectral order by fraclog nloglog n times the original graph Laplacian. We also show a lower bound that in ε-2 log n spanning trees are necessary to get a (1± ε) spectral sparsifier.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Optimal Sublinear Sampling of Spanning Trees and Determinantal Point Processes via Average-Case Entropic Independencecited by 8
- 2022Sparsification of the regularized magnetic Laplacian with multi-type spanning forestscited by 1
- 2023On sampling determinantal and Pfaffian point processes on a quantum computercited by 1
- 2025Bypassing orthogonalization in the quantum DPP samplercited by 0
- 2026CAST: Canonical Approximate Schur Tree for Approximate Cholesky on Graphscited by 0
- 2026CAST: Canonical Approximate Schur Tree for Approximate Cholesky on Graphs8 Sep 2026
- 2025Bypassing orthogonalization in the quantum DPP sampler7 Mar 2025
- 2023On sampling determinantal and Pfaffian point processes on a quantum computer25 May 2023
- 2022Sparsification of the regularized magnetic Laplacian with multi-type spanning forests31 Aug 2022
- 2022Optimal Sublinear Sampling of Spanning Trees and Determinantal Point Processes via Average-Case Entropic Independence6 Apr 2022