Discriminative calibration: Check Bayesian computation from simulations and flexible classifier
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To check the accuracy of Bayesian computations, it is common to use rank-based simulation-based calibration (SBC). However, SBC has drawbacks: The test statistic is somewhat ad-hoc, interactions are difficult to examine, multiple testing is a challenge, and the resulting p-value is not a divergence metric. We propose to replace the marginal rank test with a flexible classification approach that learns test statistics from data. This measure typically has a higher statistical power than the SBC rank test and returns an interpretable divergence measure of miscalibration, computed from classification accuracy. This approach can be used with different data generating processes to address likelihood-free inference or traditional inference methods like Markov chain Monte Carlo or variational inference. We illustrate an automated implementation using neural networks and statistically-inspired features, and validate the method with numerical and real data experiments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
23 of 53 references.
References · 23
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
- 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
- 2021Benchmarking Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 160
- 2017Measuring Sample Quality with Kernelscited by 119
- 2018Validating Bayesian Inference Algorithms with Simulation-Based Calibrationcited by 118
- 2019Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved widehatR for assessing convergence of MCMCcited by 90
- 2021Real-time gravitational-wave science with neural posterior estimationcited by 76
- 2018Yes, but Did It Work?: Evaluating Variational Inferencecited by 52
- 2013Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian modelscited by 51
11 more
- 2023Sampling-Based Accuracy Testing of Posterior Estimators for General Inferencecited by 45
- 2020Advances in Black-Box VI: Normalizing Flows, Importance Weighting, and Optimizationcited by 37
- 2022GATSBI: Generative Adversarial Training for Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 36
- 2021A Trust Crisis In Simulation-Based Inference? Your Posterior Approximations Can Be Unfaithfulcited by 27
- 2017Visualization in Bayesian workflowcited by 25
- 2020Neural Empirical Bayes: Source Distribution Estimation and its Applications to Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 21
- 2022Simulation-Based Calibration Checking for Bayesian Computation: The Choice of Test Quantities Shapes Sensitivitycited by 19
- 2023A Deep Learning Method for Comparing Bayesian Hierarchical Modelscited by 11
- 2013Diagnostic tools of approximate Bayesian computation using the coverage propertycited by 10
- 2022Validation Diagnostics for SBI algorithms based on Normalizing Flowscited by 8
- 2021An Easy to Interpret Diagnostic for Approximate Inference: Symmetric Divergence Over Simulationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.
- 2023L-C2ST: Local Diagnostics for Posterior Approximations in Simulation-Based Inferencecited by 17
- 2023Simulation-based stackingcited by 3
- 2023Simulation-based stacking25 Oct 2023
- 2023L-C2ST: Local Diagnostics for Posterior Approximations in Simulation-Based Inference6 Jun 2023