mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Easy to Interpret Diagnostic for Approximate Inference: Symmetric Divergence Over Simulations

arXiv 2103.01030 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is important to estimate the errors of probabilistic inference algorithms. Existing diagnostics for Markov chain Monte Carlo methods assume inference is asymptotically exact, and are not appropriate for approximate methods like variational inference or Laplace's method. This paper introduces a diagnostic based on repeatedly simulating datasets from the prior and performing inference on each. The central observation is that it is possible to estimate a symmetric KL-divergence defined over these simulations.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2021.

Builds on

13 of 25 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 454
  2. 2016Automatic Differentiation Variational Inferencecited by 159
  3. 2017Measuring Sample Quality with Kernelscited by 119
  4. 2016R'enyi Divergence Variational Inferencecited by 104
  5. 2017Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational Inferencecited by 97
  6. 2015Measuring Sample Quality with Stein's Methodcited by 94
  7. 2017Variational Sequential Monte Carlocited by 93
  8. 2017Filtering Variational Objectivescited by 91
  9. 2017Auto-Encoding Sequential Monte Carlocited by 64
  10. 2018Importance Weighting and Variational Inferencecited by 55
  11. 2018Yes, but Did It Work?: Evaluating Variational Inferencecited by 52
  12. 2017Reinterpreting Importance-Weighted Autoencoderscited by 36
1 more
  1. 2015Sandwiching the marginal likelihood using bidirectional Monte Carlocited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.