mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TOM: Learning Policy-Aware Models for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning via Transition Occupancy Matching

arXiv 2305.12663 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) approaches fit a transition model of the environment to all past experience, but this wastes model capacity on data that is irrelevant for policy improvement. We instead propose a new "transition occupancy matching" (TOM) objective for MBRL model learning: a model is good to the extent that the current policy experiences the same distribution of transitions inside the model as in the real environment. We derive TOM directly from a novel lower bound on the standard reinforcement learning objective. To optimize TOM, we show how to reduce it to a form of importance weighted maximum-likelihood estimation, where the automatically computed importance weights identify policy-relevant past experiences from a replay buffer, enabling stable optimization. TOM thus offers a plug-and-play model learning sub-routine that is compatible with any backbone MBRL algorithm. On various Mujoco continuous robotic control tasks, we show that TOM successfully focuses model learning on policy-relevant experience and drives policies faster to higher task rewards than alternative model learning approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

26 of 35 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
  5. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,427
  6. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,264
  7. 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 1,007
  8. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 774
  9. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
  10. 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 636
  11. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 590
  12. 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Ataricited by 502
14 more
  1. 2022DayDreamer: World Models for Physical Robot Learningcited by 400
  2. 2022VIP: Towards Universal Visual Reward and Representation via Value-Implicit Pre-Trainingcited by 395
  3. 2016Deep Visual Foresight for Planning Robot Motioncited by 285
  4. 2018Visual Foresight: Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Controlcited by 230
  5. 2019Deep Dynamics Models for Learning Dexterous Manipulationcited by 206
  6. 2020Reinforcement Learning via Fenchel-Rockafellar Dualitycited by 100
  7. 2020Objective Mismatch in Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  8. 2020The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
  9. 2022How Far I'll Go: Offline Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning via f-Advantage Regressioncited by 66
  10. 2022Investigating Compounding Prediction Errors in Learned Dynamics Modelscited by 47
  11. 2021Mismatched No More: Joint Model-Policy Optimization for Model-Based RLcited by 36
  12. 2022Value Gradient weighted Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
  13. 2022Live in the Moment: Learning Dynamics Model Adapted to Evolving Policycited by 17
  14. 2021Self-Consistent Models and Valuescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

10 papers.