mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Normalizing flow sampling with Langevin dynamics in the latent space

arXiv 2305.12149 ↗First posted 20 May 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Normalizing flows (NF) use a continuous generator to map a simple latent (e.g. Gaussian) distribution, towards an empirical target distribution associated with a training data set. Once trained by minimizing a variational objective, the learnt map provides an approximate generative model of the target distribution. Since standard NF implement differentiable maps, they may suffer from pathological behaviors when targeting complex distributions. For instance, such problems may appear for distributions on multi-component topologies or characterized by multiple modes with high probability regions separated by very unlikely areas. A typical symptom is the explosion of the Jacobian norm of the transformation in very low probability areas. This paper proposes to overcome this issue thanks to a new Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to sample from the target distribution in the latent domain before transporting it back to the target domain. The approach relies on a Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA) whose dynamics explicitly exploits the Jacobian of the transformation. Contrary to alternative approaches, the proposed strategy preserves the tractability of the likelihood and it does not require a specific training. Notably, it can be straightforwardly used with any pre-trained NF network, regardless of the architecture. Experiments conducted on synthetic and high-dimensional real data sets illustrate the efficiency of the method.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2023.

Builds on

24 of 50 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  4. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  5. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  6. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
  7. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
  8. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,315
  9. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 680
  10. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  11. 2017The Reversible Residual Network: Backpropagation Without Storing Activationscited by 215
  12. 2017Latent Space Oddity: on the Curvature of Deep Generative Modelscited by 169
12 more
  1. 2020Stochastic Normalizing Flowscited by 156
  2. 2018Neural Importance Samplingcited by 154
  3. 2019Semi-Supervised Learning with Normalizing Flowscited by 76
  4. 2019NeuTra-lizing Bad Geometry in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Using Neural Transportcited by 73
  5. 2020SurVAE Flows: Surjections to Bridge the Gap between VAEs and Flowscited by 71
  6. 2020Augmented Normalizing Flows: Bridging the Gap Between Generative Flows and Latent Variable Modelscited by 66
  7. 2021Resampling Base Distributions of Normalizing Flowscited by 42
  8. 2020Stabilizing Invertible Neural Networks Using Mixture Modelscited by 30
  9. 2013Langevin diffusions and the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithmcited by 29
  10. 2021Local-Global MCMC kernels: the best of both worldscited by 21
  11. 2020Variational Mixture of Normalizing Flowscited by 15
  12. 2022Sliced-Wasserstein normalizing flows: beyond maximum likelihood trainingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

7 papers.