mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sliced-Wasserstein normalizing flows: beyond maximum likelihood training

arXiv 2207.05468 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2022stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite their advantages, normalizing flows generally suffer from several shortcomings including their tendency to generate unrealistic data (e.g., images) and their failing to detect out-of-distribution data. One reason for these deficiencies lies in the training strategy which traditionally exploits a maximum likelihood principle only. This paper proposes a new training paradigm based on a hybrid objective function combining the maximum likelihood principle (MLE) and a sliced-Wasserstein distance. Results obtained on synthetic toy examples and real image data sets show better generative abilities in terms of both likelihood and visual aspects of the generated samples. Reciprocally, the proposed approach leads to a lower likelihood of out-of-distribution data, demonstrating a greater data fidelity of the resulting flows.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2022.

Builds on

7 of 9 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  3. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  4. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  5. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  6. 2018Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 443
  7. 2022Revisiting Sliced Wasserstein on Images: From Vectorization to Convolutioncited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.