mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring the Viability of Synthetic Query Generation for Relevance Prediction

arXiv 2305.11944 ↗First posted 19 May 2023cs.IR cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Query-document relevance prediction is a critical problem in Information Retrieval systems. This problem has increasingly been tackled using (pretrained) transformer-based models which are finetuned using large collections of labeled data. However, in specialized domains such as e-commerce and healthcare, the viability of this approach is limited by the dearth of large in-domain data. To address this paucity, recent methods leverage these powerful models to generate high-quality task and domain-specific synthetic data. Prior work has largely explored synthetic data generation or query generation (QGen) for Question-Answering (QA) and binary (yes/no) relevance prediction, where for instance, the QGen models are given a document, and trained to generate a query relevant to that document. However in many problems, we have a more fine-grained notion of relevance than a simple yes/no label. Thus, in this work, we conduct a detailed study into how QGen approaches can be leveraged for nuanced relevance prediction. We demonstrate that -- contrary to claims from prior works -- current QGen approaches fall short of the more conventional cross-domain transfer-learning approaches. Via empirical studies spanning 3 public e-commerce benchmarks, we identify new shortcomings of existing QGen approaches -- including their inability to distinguish between different grades of relevance. To address this, we introduce label-conditioned QGen models which incorporates knowledge about the different relevance. While our experiments demonstrate that these modifications help improve performance of QGen techniques, we also find that QGen approaches struggle to capture the full nuance of the relevance label space and as a result the generated queries are not faithful to the desired relevance label.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

26 of 39 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  6. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  8. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  9. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  10. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
  11. 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
  12. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
14 more
  1. 2022Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examplescited by 233
  2. 2019Document Expansion by Query Predictioncited by 225
  3. 2017Learning to Ask: Neural Question Generation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 186
  4. 2020Data Augmentation using Pre-trained Transformer Modelscited by 168
  5. 2019Synthetic QA Corpora Generation with Roundtrip Consistencycited by 143
  6. 2022RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Lossescited by 114
  7. 2017Neural Question Generation from Text: A Preliminary Studycited by 78
  8. 2022InPars: Data Augmentation for Information Retrieval using Large Language Modelscited by 60
  9. 2022Shopping Queries Dataset: A Large-Scale ESCI Benchmark for Improving Product Searchcited by 58
  10. 2018Harvesting Paragraph-Level Question-Answer Pairs from Wikipediacited by 49
  11. 2021Controllable Open-ended Question Generation with A New Question Type Ontologycited by 36
  12. 2016Generating Factoid Questions With Recurrent Neural Networks: The 30M Factoid Question-Answer Corpuscited by 33
  13. 2020Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehensioncited by 31
  14. 2022CONSISTENT: Open-Ended Question Generation From News Articlescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

9 papers.