Multi-objective optimisation via the R2 utilities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of multi-objective optimisation is to identify a collection of points which describe the best possible trade-offs between the multiple objectives. In order to solve this vector-valued optimisation problem, practitioners often appeal to the use of scalarisation functions in order to transform the multi-objective problem into a collection of single-objective problems. This set of scalarised problems can then be solved using traditional single-objective optimisation techniques. In this work, we formalise this convention into a general mathematical framework. We show how this strategy effectively recasts the original multi-objective optimisation problem into a single-objective optimisation problem defined over sets. An appropriate class of objective functions for this new problem are the R2 utilities, which are utility functions that are defined as a weighted integral over the scalarised optimisation problems. As part of our work, we show that these utilities are monotone and submodular set functions which can be optimised effectively using greedy optimisation algorithms. We then analyse the performance of these greedy algorithms both theoretically and empirically. Our analysis largely focusses on Bayesian optimisation, which is a popular probabilistic framework for black-box optimisation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.
Builds on
23 of 106 references.
References · 23
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 809
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 253
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
- 2021Parallel Bayesian Optimization of Multiple Noisy Objectives with Expected Hypervolume Improvementcited by 115
- 2014Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 109
- 2018A Flexible Framework for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization using Random Scalarizationscited by 98
- 2020Max-value Entropy Search for Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization with Constraintscited by 81
- 2020An Easy-to-use Real-world Multi-objective Optimization Problem Suitecited by 71
- 2020Random Hypervolume Scalarizations for Provable Multi-Objective Black Box Optimizationcited by 60
- 2019Greed is Good: Exploration and Exploitation Trade-offs in Bayesian Optimisationcited by 47
- 2022Joint Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimizationcited by 45
- 2022Preference Exploration for Efficient Bayesian Optimization with Multiple Outcomescited by 41
11 more
- 2022Robust Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Under Input Noisecited by 36
- 2016Predictive Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization with Constraintscited by 27
- 2013Multiobjective optimization using Gaussian process emulators via stepwise uncertainty reductioncited by 21
- 2019Multi-Attribute Bayesian Optimization With Interactive Preference Learningcited by 21
- 2020No-regret Algorithms for Multi-task Bayesian Optimizationcited by 18
- 2018Ordered Preference Elicitation Strategies for Supporting Multi-Objective Decision Makingcited by 17
- 2021Multi-Objective Learning to Predict Pareto Fronts Using Hypervolume Maximizationcited by 16
- 2019Scalarizing Functions in Bayesian Multiobjective Optimizationcited by 15
- 2019The Kalai-Smorodinski solution for many-objective Bayesian optimizationcited by 13
- 2015Noisy Submodular Maximization via Adaptive Sampling with Applications to Crowdsourced Image Collection Summarizationcited by 11
- 2016A Bayesian optimization approach to find Nash equilibriacited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.