mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A quality assurance framework for real-time monitoring of deep learning segmentation models in radiotherapy

arXiv 2305.11715 ↗First posted 19 May 2023eess.IV cs.CV physics.med-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To safely deploy deep learning models in the clinic, a quality assurance framework is needed for routine or continuous monitoring of input-domain shift and the models' performance without ground truth contours. In this work, cardiac substructure segmentation was used as an example task to establish a QA framework. A benchmark dataset consisting of Computed Tomography (CT) images along with manual cardiac delineations of 241 patients were collected, including one 'common' image domain and five 'uncommon' domains. Segmentation models were tested on the benchmark dataset for an initial evaluation of model capacity and limitations. An image domain shift detector was developed by utilizing a trained Denoising autoencoder (DAE) and two hand-engineered features. Another Variational Autoencoder (VAE) was also trained to estimate the shape quality of the auto-segmentation results. Using the extracted features from the image/segmentation pair as inputs, a regression model was trained to predict the per-patient segmentation accuracy, measured by Dice coefficient similarity (DSC). The framework was tested across 19 segmentation models to evaluate the generalizability of the entire framework. As results, the predicted DSC of regression models achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) ranging from 0.036 to 0.046 with an averaged MAE of 0.041. When tested on the benchmark dataset, the performances of all segmentation models were not significantly affected by scanning parameters: FOV, slice thickness and reconstructions kernels. For input images with Poisson noise, CNN-based segmentation models demonstrated a decreased DSC ranging from 0.07 to 0.41, while the transformer-based model was not significantly affected.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

22 of 39 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  4. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
  5. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  6. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
  7. 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
  8. 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
  9. 2020Unsupervised Bidirectional Cross-Modality Adaptation via Deeply Synergistic Image and Feature Alignment for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 134
  10. 2020Test-Time Adaptable Neural Networks for Robust Medical Image Segmentationcited by 102
  11. 2021Delving Deep into the Generalization of Vision Transformers under Distribution Shiftscited by 85
  12. 2018A Lifelong Learning Approach to Brain MR Segmentation Across Scanners and Protocolscited by 49
10 more
  1. 2018Leveraging Uncertainty Estimates for Predicting Segmentation Qualitycited by 44
  2. 2019Machine Learning with Multi-Site Imaging Data: An Empirical Study on the Impact of Scanner Effectscited by 43
  3. 2019The reliability of a deep learning model in clinical out-of-distribution MRI data: a multicohort studycited by 38
  4. 2020Studying Robustness of Semantic Segmentation under Domain Shift in cardiac MRIcited by 28
  5. 2018Real-time Prediction of Segmentation Qualitycited by 23
  6. 2020Deep Generative Model-based Quality Control for Cardiac MRI Segmentationcited by 22
  7. 2021Objective task-based evaluation of artificial intelligence-based medical imaging methods: Framework, strategies and role of the physiciancited by 16
  8. 2019An Alarm System For Segmentation Algorithm Based On Shape Modelcited by 8
  9. 2022CheXstray: Real-time Multi-Modal Data Concordance for Drift Detection in Medical Imaging AIcited by 7
  10. 2020Assessing Robustness to Noise: Low-Cost Head CT Triagecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.